arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2405.08099cs.CL

KET-QA:一个面向知识增强表格问答的数据集

KET-QA: A Dataset for Knowledge Enhanced Table Question Answering

The University of Hong Kong(香港大学);Microsoft(微软公司)

Mengkang Hu, Haoyu Dong, Ping Luo, Shi Han, Dongmei Zhang

AI总结:

针对表格问答中知识缺失的问题,本文提出以知识库为外部知识源,构建带细粒度标注的KET-QA数据集,设计检索器-推理器流水线模型,实验显示其性能显著优于传统方法,但仍不及人类水平。

摘要:

由于表格具有简洁性和结构化的特性,其中包含的知识可能存在不完整或缺失的问题,这给表格问答(TableQA)和数据分析系统带来了重大挑战。现有大多数数据集要么未解决TableQA中的外部知识问题,要么仅将非结构化文本用作表格的补充信息。本文提出将知识库(KB)作为TableQA的外部知识源,并构建了带有细粒度黄金证据标注的数据集KET-QA。该数据集中的每个表格都对应整个知识库的一个子图,且每个问题都需要整合表格与该子图中的信息才能作答。为从庞大的知识子图中提取相关信息并将其应用于TableQA,我们设计了一个检索器-推理器结构的流水线模型。实验结果表明,与传统TableQA方式中仅依赖表格信息的方法相比,我们的模型在三种不同设置(微调、零样本、少样本)下的EM分数均实现了显著的相对性能提升,提升幅度为1.9至6.5倍,绝对提升幅度为11.66%至44.64%。然而,即便是性能最优的模型,其EM分数也仅为60.23%,仍落后于人类水平的表现,这凸显了KET-QA对问答领域而言的挑战性。我们还对错误案例进行了人工评估,以进一步分析模型可改进的方面。项目页面:https://ketqa.github.io/。

英文摘要:

Due to the concise and structured nature of tables, the knowledge contained therein may be incomplete or missing, posing a significant challenge for table question answering (TableQA) and data analysis systems. Most existing datasets either fail to address the issue of external knowledge in TableQA or only utilize unstructured text as supplementary information for tables. In this paper, we propose to use a knowledge base (KB) as the external knowledge source for TableQA and construct a dataset KET-QA with fine-grained gold evidence annotation. Each table in the dataset corresponds to a sub-graph of the entire KB, and every question requires the integration of information from both the table and the sub-graph to be answered. To extract pertinent information from the vast knowledge sub-graph and apply it to TableQA, we design a retriever-reasoner structured pipeline model. Experimental results demonstrate that our model consistently achieves remarkable relative performance improvements ranging from 1.9 to 6.5 times and absolute improvements of 11.66% to 44.64% on EM scores across three distinct settings (fine-tuning, zero-shot, and few-shot), in comparison with solely relying on table information in the traditional TableQA manner. However, even the best model achieves a 60.23% EM score, which still lags behind the human-level performance, highlighting the challenging nature of KET-QA for the question-answering community. We also provide a human evaluation of error cases to analyze further the aspects in which the model can be improved. Project page: https://ketqa.github.io/.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑