arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2405.08044cs.LGcs.AI
收藏

在联邦学习中基于Shapley的贡献度波动性研究

On the Volatility of Shapley-Based Contribution Metrics in Federated Learning

SnT, University of Luxembourg(卢森堡大学SnT学院)

Arno Geimer, Beltran Fiz, Radu State

AI总结:

本文研究了联邦学习中基于Shapley值的贡献度波动性,通过梯度模型重建技术评估参与者贡献,并分析了不同聚合策略下的稳定性问题。

摘要:

联邦学习(FL)是一种协作且隐私保护的机器学习范式,允许在无需集中敏感数据的情况下开发稳健的模型。FL中的关键挑战在于公平且准确地分配来自不同参与者的贡献。不准确的分配可能破坏信任,导致不公平补偿,从而使参与者缺乏加入或积极贡献到联邦的激励。迄今为止,已提出各种报酬策略,包括基于拍卖的方法和基于Shapley值的方法,后者提供了一种量化每个参与者贡献的手段。然而,很少有工作研究了这些贡献评估方法的稳定性。在本文中,我们使用基于梯度的模型重建技术与Shapley值来评估联邦学习中的参与者贡献,并将基于轮次的贡献与经典的数据贡献测量方案进行比较。我们对一组聚合策略下的Shapley值差异进行了广泛分析,并在整体和每个客户端层面进行了检验。我们显示,在不同的聚合技术之间,Shapley值导致参与者之间的奖励分配不稳定。我们的分析涵盖了各种数据异质性分布,包括独立和相同分布(IID)和非IID场景。

英文摘要:

Federated learning (FL) is a collaborative and privacy-preserving Machine Learning paradigm, allowing the development of robust models without the need to centralize sensitive data. A critical challenge in FL lies in fairly and accurately allocating contributions from diverse participants. Inaccurate allocation can undermine trust, lead to unfair compensation, and thus participants may lack the incentive to join or actively contribute to the federation. Various remuneration strategies have been proposed to date, including auction-based approaches and Shapley-value-based methods, the latter offering a means to quantify the contribution of each participant. However, little to no work has studied the stability of these contribution evaluation methods. In this paper, we evaluate participant contributions in federated learning using gradient-based model reconstruction techniques with Shapley values and compare the round-based contributions to a classic data contribution measurement scheme. We provide an extensive analysis of the discrepancies of Shapley values across a set of aggregation strategies and examine them on an overall and a per-client level. We show that, between different aggregation techniques, Shapley values lead to unstable reward allocations among participants. Our analysis spans various data heterogeneity distributions, including independent and identically distributed (IID) and non-IID scenarios.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑