arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2404.14409cs.CV

CrossScore:迈向多视图图像评估与评分

CrossScore: Towards Multi-View Image Evaluation and Scoring

Zirui Wang, Wenjing Bian, Victor Adrian Prisacariu

AI总结:

提出一种基于交叉注意力机制的交叉参考图像质量评估方法 CrossScore,通过比较同一场景的多视图,在无需真实参考图像的情况下实现了与 SSIM 高度相关的准确评估,填补了新视图合成等任务中的评估空白。

摘要:

我们提出了一种新颖的交叉参考图像质量评估方法,该方法有效填补了图像评估领域的空白,补充了现有的评估方案体系——从全参考指标(如 SSIM)、无参考指标(如 NIQE),到通用参考指标(包括 FID)以及多模态参考指标(如 CLIPScore)。利用具有交叉注意力机制的神经网络以及源自 NVS 优化的独特数据收集流程,我们的方法无需真实参考即可实现准确的图像质量评估。通过将查询图像与同一场景的多个视图进行比较,我们的方法解决了现有指标在新视图合成(NVS)及类似任务中无法获取直接参考图像的局限性。实验结果表明,我们的方法与全参考指标 SSIM 密切相关,同时无需真实参考。

英文摘要:

We introduce a novel cross-reference image quality assessment method that effectively fills the gap in the image assessment landscape, complementing the array of established evaluation schemes -- ranging from full-reference metrics like SSIM, no-reference metrics such as NIQE, to general-reference metrics including FID, and Multi-modal-reference metrics, e.g., CLIPScore. Utilising a neural network with the cross-attention mechanism and a unique data collection pipeline from NVS optimisation, our method enables accurate image quality assessment without requiring ground truth references. By comparing a query image against multiple views of the same scene, our method addresses the limitations of existing metrics in novel view synthesis (NVS) and similar tasks where direct reference images are unavailable. Experimental results show that our method is closely correlated to the full-reference metric SSIM, while not requiring ground truth references.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑