arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2404.12349cs.AIcs.HC

评估法律领域的人工智能:用开源解决方案弥合差距

Evaluating AI for Law: Bridging the Gap with Open-Source Solutions

Ingenuity Labs(Ingenuity 实验室);Cornell University(康奈尔大学)

Rohan Bhambhoria, Samuel Dahan, Jonathan Li, Xiaodan Zhu

AI总结:

本研究评估通用AI在法律问答中的风险,提出用领域知识增强基础模型并创建开源法律AI系统,以提高准确性、透明度和叙事多样性。

摘要:

本研究评估了通用人工智能(如ChatGPT)在法律问答任务中的表现,凸显了对法律专业人士和客户的重大风险。研究建议利用由领域特定知识增强的基础模型来克服这些问题。本文主张创建开源法律人工智能系统,以提高准确性、透明度和叙事多样性,从而解决通用人工智能在法律情境中的不足。

英文摘要:

This study evaluates the performance of general-purpose AI, like ChatGPT, in legal question-answering tasks, highlighting significant risks to legal professionals and clients. It suggests leveraging foundational models enhanced by domain-specific knowledge to overcome these issues. The paper advocates for creating open-source legal AI systems to improve accuracy, transparency, and narrative diversity, addressing general AI's shortcomings in legal contexts.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑