arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2404.07984cs.CV

通过扩散排名进行3D描述生成的视图选择

View Selection for 3D Captioning via Diffusion Ranking

University of Michigan LG AI Research(密歇根大学LG人工智能研究)

Tiange Luo, Justin Johnson, Honglak Lee

AI总结:

本文提出DiffuRank方法,通过评估3D物体与2D视图的对齐度,提升3D描述生成的准确性与细节,同时扩展数据集规模并优于CLIP模型。

摘要:

可扩展的注释方法对于构建广泛的3D文本数据集至关重要,有助于更广泛的应用。然而,现有方法有时会导致生成幻觉描述,影响描述质量。本文探讨了3D物体描述中的幻觉问题,重点是Cap3D方法,该方法使用预训练模型将3D物体渲染为2D视图进行描述。我们指出一个主要挑战:某些3D物体的渲染视图是不典型的,偏离标准图像描述模型的训练数据,导致幻觉。为解决这一问题,我们提出了DiffuRank方法,利用预训练的文本到3D模型来评估3D物体与其2D渲染视图之间的对齐情况,其中对齐度高的视图更贴近物体特征。通过对所有渲染视图进行排名,并将排名靠前的视图输入GPT4-Vision,我们提高了描述的准确性和细节,使Cap3D数据集中的200k描述得到修正,并扩展到Objaverse和Objaverse-XL数据集的100万描述。此外,我们通过将其应用于预训练的文本到图像模型进行视觉问答任务,展示了DiffuRank的适应性,其中它在CLIP模型上表现更优。

英文摘要:

Scalable annotation approaches are crucial for constructing extensive 3D-text datasets, facilitating a broader range of applications. However, existing methods sometimes lead to the generation of hallucinated captions, compromising caption quality. This paper explores the issue of hallucination in 3D object captioning, with a focus on Cap3D method, which renders 3D objects into 2D views for captioning using pre-trained models. We pinpoint a major challenge: certain rendered views of 3D objects are atypical, deviating from the training data of standard image captioning models and causing hallucinations. To tackle this, we present DiffuRank, a method that leverages a pre-trained text-to-3D model to assess the alignment between 3D objects and their 2D rendered views, where the view with high alignment closely represent the object's characteristics. By ranking all rendered views and feeding the top-ranked ones into GPT4-Vision, we enhance the accuracy and detail of captions, enabling the correction of 200k captions in the Cap3D dataset and extending it to 1 million captions across Objaverse and Objaverse-XL datasets. Additionally, we showcase the adaptability of DiffuRank by applying it to pre-trained text-to-image models for a Visual Question Answering task, where it outperforms the CLIP model.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑