arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2404.04456cs.CVcs.AIcs.LG

超越已知:对抗自编码器在新颖性检测中的应用

Beyond the Known: Adversarial Autoencoders in Novelty Detection

Machine Learning Research Group, School of Computer Science, University of Galway(戈尔韦大学计算机科学学院机器学习研究组);Insight SFI Research Centre for Data Analytics, University of Galway(戈尔韦大学Insight SFI数据分析研究中心);Valeo Vision Systems(法雷奥视觉系统公司)

Muhammad Asad, Ihsan Ullah, Ganesh Sistu, Michael G. Madden

AI总结:

本文面向新颖性检测,提出轻量级对抗自编码器框架,通过流形线性化与重构误差计算样本属于内点分布的概率,并改进训练协议,在多个基准上超越现有方法。

摘要:

在新颖性检测中,目标是在给定一个主要捕获内点分布的训练数据集的情况下,判断一个新数据点应被归类为内点还是离群点。近期方法通常使用深度编码器和解码器网络框架来获得重构误差,并利用该误差确定新颖性分数,或将其作为单类分类器的基础。在本研究中,我们使用类似框架,但采用轻量级深度网络,并采用结合重构误差的概率分数。我们的方法计算样本是否来自内点分布的概率。本工作有两项关键贡献。第一,我们通过线性化承载内点分布结构的流形来计算新颖性概率。这使我们能够解释概率如何分布,以及如何结合流形切空间的局部坐标来确定该概率。第二项贡献是我们改进了网络的训练协议。结果表明,我们的方法能有效学习目标类别,并在多个基准数据集上优于近期最先进方法。

英文摘要:

In novelty detection, the goal is to decide if a new data point should be categorized as an inlier or an outlier, given a training dataset that primarily captures the inlier distribution. Recent approaches typically use deep encoder and decoder network frameworks to derive a reconstruction error, and employ this error either to determine a novelty score, or as the basis for a one-class classifier. In this research, we use a similar framework but with a lightweight deep network, and we adopt a probabilistic score with reconstruction error. Our methodology calculates the probability of whether the sample comes from the inlier distribution or not. This work makes two key contributions. The first is that we compute the novelty probability by linearizing the manifold that holds the structure of the inlier distribution. This allows us to interpret how the probability is distributed and can be determined in relation to the local coordinates of the manifold tangent space. The second contribution is that we improve the training protocol for the network. Our results indicate that our approach is effective at learning the target class, and it outperforms recent state-of-the-art methods on several benchmark datasets.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑