arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2404.01656cs.CV

利用观察者间眼动一致性支持有丝分裂检测AI训练

Supporting Mitosis Detection AI Training with Inter-Observer Eye-Gaze Consistencies

University of California, Los Angeles(加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校);University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign(伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳-香槟分校);UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine(加州大学洛杉矶分校大卫·格芬医学院);Kansas University Medical Center(堪萨斯大学医学中心)

Hongyan Gu, Zihan Yan, Ayesha Alvi, Brandon Day, Chunxu Yang, Zida Wu, Shino Magaki, Mohammad Haeri, Xiang 'Anthony' Chen

AI总结:

本研究提出利用观察者间一致的眼动注视点生成低成本训练标签,用于有丝分裂检测AI训练,实验表明其性能接近真实标注并显著优于启发式基线。

摘要:

人工智能(AI)在病理学任务中的扩展加剧了AI开发中对医生标注的需求。然而,从医生处收集高质量标注既昂贵又耗时,成为AI进展中的瓶颈。本研究探讨了眼动追踪作为一种具有成本效益的技术,用于收集医生的行为数据以训练AI,重点关注有丝分裂检测这一病理学任务。使用眼动数据的一个主要挑战是信噪比低,这阻碍了有意义信息的提取。我们通过利用观察者间眼动一致性的特性,并基于一组观察者共享的一致眼动注视点来生成眼动标签,从而解决了这一问题。本研究涉及14名非医学背景的参与者,我们收集了他们的眼动数据,并根据不同的组规模生成了眼动标签。我们通过训练卷积神经网络(CNNs)评估了这些眼动标签的有效性,并将其性能与使用真实标注训练的CNN以及基于启发式的基线方法进行了比较。结果表明,使用我们的眼动标签训练的CNN在性能上接近基于真实标注的CNN,并显著优于基线方法。尽管主要聚焦于有丝分裂检测,我们预计本研究的见解可以推广到其他医学成像任务。

英文摘要:

The expansion of artificial intelligence (AI) in pathology tasks has intensified the demand for doctors' annotations in AI development. However, collecting high-quality annotations from doctors is costly and time-consuming, creating a bottleneck in AI progress. This study investigates eye-tracking as a cost-effective technology to collect doctors' behavioral data for AI training with a focus on the pathology task of mitosis detection. One major challenge in using eye-gaze data is the low signal-to-noise ratio, which hinders the extraction of meaningful information. We tackled this by levering the properties of inter-observer eye-gaze consistencies and creating eye-gaze labels from consistent eye-fixations shared by a group of observers. Our study involved 14 non-medical participants, from whom we collected eye-gaze data and generated eye-gaze labels based on varying group sizes. We assessed the efficacy of such eye-gaze labels by training Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and comparing their performance to those trained with ground truth annotations and a heuristic-based baseline. Results indicated that CNNs trained with our eye-gaze labels closely followed the performance of ground-truth-based CNNs, and significantly outperformed the baseline. Although primarily focused on mitosis, we envision that insights from this study can be generalized to other medical imaging tasks.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑