arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2403.20331cs.CVcs.AIcs.CLcs.LG

不可解问题检测:面向大型多模态模型的鲁棒理解评估

Unsolvable Problem Detection: Robust Understanding Evaluation for Large Multimodal Models

The University of Tokyo(东京大学);S-Lab, Nanyang Technological University(南洋理工大学S实验室);Duke University(杜克大学);University of Wisconsin-Madison(威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校);LY Corporation(LY公司);Tokyo University of Science(东京科学大学)

Atsuyuki Miyai, Jingkang Yang, Jingyang Zhang, Yifei Ming, Qing Yu, Go Irie, Yixuan Li, Hai Li, Ziwei Liu, Kiyoharu Aizawa

AI总结:

提出不可解问题检测任务UPD及MM-UPD Bench,通过识别无答案、选项冲突和图文不匹配问题,检验大型多模态模型是否真正理解选择题。

摘要:

本文提出了一项用于评估大型多模态模型(LMM)鲁棒理解能力的新任务,称为“不可解问题检测(Unsolvable Problem Detection,UPD)”。多项选择问答(MCQA)被广泛用于评估LMM的理解能力,但它并不能保证LMM真正理解答案。UPD评估LMM在遇到MCQA中的不可解问题时弃权(不执行)作答的能力,从而验证模型是否真正理解答案。UPD包含三类问题:缺失答案检测(Absent Answer Detection,AAD)、不相容答案集检测(Incompatible Answer Set Detection,IASD)和不相容视觉问题检测(Incompatible Visual Question Detection,IVQD),涵盖答案缺失或选项不相容、图像与问题不匹配等不可解情形。为开展评估,作者提出MM-UPD Bench,这是一个用于评估多种能力维度表现的基准。实验表明,即便是大多数在现有基准上表现充分的LMM,也在MM-UPD上明显遇挫,这凸显了当前基准所忽视的一个可信性新维度。详细分析显示,LMM存在不同瓶颈;对于瓶颈位于LLM能力的LMM,思维链和自我反思能够提升性能。作者希望这些洞见能够增进更广泛的理解,并推动更可靠LMM的开发。代码位于https://github.com/AtsuMiyai/UPD。

英文摘要:

This paper introduces a novel task to evaluate the robust understanding capability of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs), termed $\textbf{Unsolvable Problem Detection (UPD)}$. Multiple-choice question answering (MCQA) is widely used to assess the understanding capability of LMMs, but it does not guarantee that LMMs truly comprehend the answer. UPD assesses the LMM's ability to withhold answers when encountering unsolvable problems of MCQA, verifying whether the model truly understands the answer. UPD encompasses three problems: Absent Answer Detection (AAD), Incompatible Answer Set Detection (IASD), and Incompatible Visual Question Detection (IVQD), covering unsolvable cases like answer-lacking or incompatible choices and image-question mismatches. For the evaluation, we introduce the MM-UPD Bench, a benchmark for assessing performance across various ability dimensions. Our experiments reveal that even most LMMs, which demonstrate adequate performance on existing benchmarks, struggle significantly with MM-UPD, underscoring a novel aspect of trustworthiness that current benchmarks have overlooked. A detailed analysis shows that LMMs have different bottlenecks and chain-of-thought and self-reflection improved performance for LMMs with the bottleneck in their LLM capability. We hope our insights will enhance the broader understanding and development of more reliable LMMs. The code is available at https://github.com/AtsuMiyai/UPD.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑