信息抽取是否存在“一模型适配所有”的方法?重新审视任务定义偏差
Is There a One-Model-Fits-All Approach to Information Extraction? Revisiting Task Definition Biases
AI总结:
本文研究了信息抽取中的任务定义偏差问题,通过探测实验揭示了统一模型和大型语言模型的局限性,并提出包含偏差测量、偏差感知微调及任务特定偏差缓解的多阶段框架,有效缓解了定义偏差。
摘要:
定义偏差是一种可能误导模型的负面现象。信息抽取中的定义偏差不仅出现在不同领域的数据集之间,也存在于共享同一领域的数据集内部。我们识别出IE中的两类定义偏差:信息抽取数据集之间的偏差,以及信息抽取数据集与指令微调数据集之间的偏差。为了系统地调查定义偏差,我们进行了三次探测实验对其进行定量分析,并发现了统一信息抽取和大型语言模型在解决定义偏差方面的局限性。为了缓解信息抽取中的定义偏差,我们提出了一个多阶段框架,包含定义偏差测量、偏差感知微调和任务特定偏差缓解。实验结果证明了我们的框架在解决定义偏差方面的有效性。本文资源可在 https://github.com/EZ-hwh/definition-bias 找到。
英文摘要:
Definition bias is a negative phenomenon that can mislead models. Definition bias in information extraction appears not only across datasets from different domains but also within datasets sharing the same domain. We identify two types of definition bias in IE: bias among information extraction datasets and bias between information extraction datasets and instruction tuning datasets. To systematically investigate definition bias, we conduct three probing experiments to quantitatively analyze it and discover the limitations of unified information extraction and large language models in solving definition bias. To mitigate definition bias in information extraction, we propose a multi-stage framework consisting of definition bias measurement, bias-aware fine-tuning, and task-specific bias mitigation. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework in addressing definition bias. Resources of this paper can be found at https://github.com/EZ-hwh/definition-bias
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。