arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2403.12596cs.CL
收藏

基于图表的推理:将能力从大语言模型迁移到视觉语言模型

Chart-based Reasoning: Transferring Capabilities from LLMs to VLMs

Google Research(谷歌研究院)

Victor Carbune, Hassan Mansoor, Fangyu Liu, Rahul Aralikatte, Gilles Baechler, Jindong Chen, Abhanshu Sharma

AI总结:

本文提出将大语言模型的推理能力迁移至视觉语言模型的方法,通过改进图表表示、扩大数据集及合成推理轨迹,使ChartPaLI-5B在ChartQA等基准上达到最先进性能,甚至超越更大模型。

摘要:

视觉语言模型(VLMs)在多模态任务上正取得越来越强的性能。然而,推理能力仍然有限,尤其是对于较小的视觉语言模型,而大语言模型(LLMs)的推理能力已得到诸多改进。我们提出了一种将能力从大语言模型迁移到视觉语言模型的技术。在最近引入的ChartQA基准上,我们的方法应用于PaLI3-5B视觉语言模型(由chen等人2023年提出)时取得了最先进的性能,同时在PlotQA和FigureQA上也实现了更好的表现。我们首先通过使用改进版的图表到表格转换任务(由liu等人2023年提出)继续预训练阶段来改进图表表示。然后,我们提出构建比原始训练集大20倍的数据集。为了提高通用推理能力和数值运算能力,我们利用图表的表格表示合成推理轨迹。最后,我们的模型使用由hsieh等人2023年引入的多任务损失进行微调。我们的变体ChartPaLI-5B甚至在没有使用上游OCR系统的情况下,超越了如PaLIX-55B等10倍大的模型,同时与PaLI3-5B基线相比保持了推理时间不变。当进一步使用简单的程序思维提示(由chen等人2023年提出)优化推理时,我们的模型超越了最近推出的Gemini Ultra和GPT-4V。

英文摘要:

Vision-language models (VLMs) are achieving increasingly strong performance on multimodal tasks. However, reasoning capabilities remain limited particularly for smaller VLMs, while those of large-language models (LLMs) have seen numerous improvements. We propose a technique to transfer capabilities from LLMs to VLMs. On the recently introduced ChartQA, our method obtains state-of-the-art performance when applied on the PaLI3-5B VLM by \citet{chen2023pali3}, while also enabling much better performance on PlotQA and FigureQA. We first improve the chart representation by continuing the pre-training stage using an improved version of the chart-to-table translation task by \citet{liu2023deplot}. We then propose constructing a 20x larger dataset than the original training set. To improve general reasoning capabilities and improve numerical operations, we synthesize reasoning traces using the table representation of charts. Lastly, our model is fine-tuned using the multitask loss introduced by \citet{hsieh2023distilling}. Our variant ChartPaLI-5B outperforms even 10x larger models such as PaLIX-55B without using an upstream OCR system, while keeping inference time constant compared to the PaLI3-5B baseline. When rationales are further refined with a simple program-of-thought prompt \cite{chen2023program}, our model outperforms the recently introduced Gemini Ultra and GPT-4V.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑