arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2403.08033physics.soc-phphysics.hist-phquant-ph
收藏

跨越量子鸿沟

Navigating the Quantum Divide(s)

A. Ayda Gercek, Zeki C. Seskir

AI总结:

本文将量子技术引发的差距划分为科学、技术、国家间和社会内部四类鸿沟,并提出兼顾其关联性的跨越策略。

摘要:

本文探讨新兴量子技术(QT)可能给社会带来的各类鸿沟,涵盖其对科学、技术、地缘政治和社会结构的影响。我们旨在通过提供全面视角,质疑单一“量子鸿沟”概念。我们提出四种鸿沟:科学领域、技术领域、国家之间以及社会内部。“科学中的量子鸿沟”凸显科学家之间的差距和研究共同体中的获取不平等。第二种鸿沟“经由路径依赖的技术量子鸿沟”考察技术采用过程。“国家间的量子鸿沟”审视不同发展水平国家的采用原因和结果。最后,“社会内部的量子鸿沟”探讨社会影响,这是文献中讨论最多的问题之一。我们提出跨越这些鸿沟的方向,并指出其相互关联性及对创新生态系统的影响。本研究为关注量子鸿沟、跨越策略以及QT对科学、技术、国际和社会制度影响的人士提供指导。

英文摘要:

This article explores the potential divides from emerging quantum technologies (QT) on society, covering impacts on science, technology, geopolitics, and societal structures. We aim to challenge the concept of a single "quantum divide" by offering a comprehensive view. We propose four divides: in science, technologies, between countries, and within societies. The "Quantum Divide in Science" highlights gaps among scientists and access inequalities in research communities. The second divide, "Quantum Divide in Technologies through Path-dependency," looks at technology adoption processes. The "Quantum Divide between Countries" examines adoption reasons and outcomes across countries with varying development levels. Lastly, the "Quantum Divide within Societies" addresses societal implications, one of the most discussed in literature. We propose directions to navigate these divides, noting their interconnectedness and impact on innovation ecosystems. This study guides those interested in the quantum divide, navigation strategies, and QT's influence on scientific, technological, international, and societal institutions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑