arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2403.05720cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
收藏

面向医院病程摘要的数据集与基准:基于自适应大语言模型

A dataset and benchmark for hospital course summarization with adapted large language models

Stanford University(斯坦福大学);The University of Texas at Austin(德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校)
Asad Aali, Dave Van Veen, Yamin Ishraq Arefeen, Jason Hom, Christian Bluethgen, Eduardo Pontes Reis, Sergios Gatidis, Namuun Clifford, Joseph Daws, Arash S. Teh… 展开作者

Asad Aali, Dave Van Veen, Yamin Ishraq Arefeen, Jason Hom, Christian Bluethgen, Eduardo Pontes Reis, Sergios Gatidis, Namuun Clifford, Joseph Daws, Arash S. Tehrani, Jangwon Kim, Akshay S. Chaudhari

AI总结:

本研究提出MIMIC-IV-BHC数据集和基准,评估多种LLMs生成医院病程摘要的性能,发现微调Llama2-13B定量最优,而GPT-4在临床评估中更受青睐。

摘要:

简要医院病程(BHC)摘要是总结患者住院期间情况的临床文档。尽管大语言模型(LLMs)在自动化现实世界任务中展现出卓越能力,但其在医疗应用(如从临床记录合成BHC)中的能力尚未得到证实。我们引入了一个新颖的预处理数据集MIMIC-IV-BHC,包含临床记录与简要医院病程(BHC)配对数据,以适配LLMs用于BHC合成。此外,我们提出了一个基准,评估两个通用LLMs和三个医疗适配LLMs的摘要性能。以临床记录为输入,我们应用基于提示(使用上下文学习)和基于微调的适配策略到三个开源LLMs(Clinical-T5-Large、Llama2-13B、FLAN-UL2)和两个专有LLMs(GPT-3.5、GPT-4)。我们使用自然语言相似性指标评估这些LLMs在多种上下文长度输入下的表现。我们还进行了一项临床研究,由五位临床医生参与,比较了临床医生撰写和LLM生成的BHC在30个样本上的差异,重点关注通过改进摘要质量增强临床决策的潜力。我们观察到,微调的Llama2-13B LLM在BLEU和BERT-Score定量评估指标上优于其他领域适配模型。带有上下文学习的GPT-4在临床记录输入上下文长度增加时表现出比微调的Llama2-13B更强的鲁棒性。尽管定量指标相当,读者研究显示,与Llama2-13B微调摘要和原始摘要相比,参与者显著偏好由带有上下文学习的GPT-4生成的摘要,这凸显了定性临床评估的必要性。

英文摘要:

Brief hospital course (BHC) summaries are clinical documents that summarize a patient's hospital stay. While large language models (LLMs) depict remarkable capabilities in automating real-world tasks, their capabilities for healthcare applications such as synthesizing BHCs from clinical notes have not been shown. We introduce a novel pre-processed dataset, the MIMIC-IV-BHC, encapsulating clinical note and brief hospital course (BHC) pairs to adapt LLMs for BHC synthesis. Furthermore, we introduce a benchmark of the summarization performance of two general-purpose LLMs and three healthcare-adapted LLMs. Using clinical notes as input, we apply prompting-based (using in-context learning) and fine-tuning-based adaptation strategies to three open-source LLMs (Clinical-T5-Large, Llama2-13B, FLAN-UL2) and two proprietary LLMs (GPT-3.5, GPT-4). We evaluate these LLMs across multiple context-length inputs using natural language similarity metrics. We further conduct a clinical study with five clinicians, comparing clinician-written and LLM-generated BHCs across 30 samples, focusing on their potential to enhance clinical decision-making through improved summary quality. We observe that the Llama2-13B fine-tuned LLM outperforms other domain-adapted models given quantitative evaluation metrics of BLEU and BERT-Score. GPT-4 with in-context learning shows more robustness to increasing context lengths of clinical note inputs than fine-tuned Llama2-13B. Despite comparable quantitative metrics, the reader study depicts a significant preference for summaries generated by GPT-4 with in-context learning compared to both Llama2-13B fine-tuned summaries and the original summaries, highlighting the need for qualitative clinical evaluation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑