arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2403.00540cs.LGmath.OCstat.ML

面向贝叶斯优化的ε-贪心汤普森采样

Epsilon-Greedy Thompson Sampling to Bayesian Optimization

University of Houston(休斯顿大学)

Bach Do, Taiwo Adebiyi, Ruda Zhang

AI总结:

针对贝叶斯优化中汤普森采样利用能力较弱的问题,本文引入ε-贪心策略在通用TS与样本平均TS间切换,实验证明合适ε值的方法鲁棒性更优。

摘要:

贝叶斯优化(BO)凭借其整合物理与数学认知、考量不确定性以及解决利用-探索困境的能力,已成为求解基于仿真的工程优化问题的有力工具。汤普森采样(TS)是BO中处理利用-探索权衡的首选方案。尽管TS通过生成并最小化来自概率模型的随机采样路径(这是BO的核心要素)来优先保障探索,但它在获取新观测后收集真实目标函数信息的过程中,对利用的管控能力较弱。本文通过引入强化学习中成熟的选择策略ε-贪心策略,提升了TS的利用能力。我们首先界定了TS的两种极端形式,即通用TS和样本平均TS:前者侧重探索,后者偏向利用。随后我们采用ε-贪心策略在这两种极端形式之间随机切换,ε值较小时主导利用,ε值较大时主导探索。通过最小化两个基准函数以及求解钢悬臂梁的逆问题,我们通过实验证明,配备合适ε值的ε-贪心TS比其两种极端形式更具鲁棒性,表现与通用TS和样本平均TS中更优的一方相当甚至更优。

英文摘要:

Bayesian optimization (BO) has become a powerful tool for solving simulation-based engineering optimization problems thanks to its ability to integrate physical and mathematical understandings, consider uncertainty, and address the exploitation-exploration dilemma. Thompson sampling (TS) is a preferred solution for BO to handle the exploitation-exploration trade-off. While it prioritizes exploration by generating and minimizing random sample paths from probabilistic models -- a fundamental ingredient of BO -- TS weakly manages exploitation by gathering information about the true objective function after it obtains new observations. In this work, we improve the exploitation of TS by incorporating the $\varepsilon$-greedy policy, a well-established selection strategy in reinforcement learning. We first delineate two extremes of TS, namely the generic TS and the sample-average TS. The former promotes exploration, while the latter favors exploitation. We then adopt the $\varepsilon$-greedy policy to randomly switch between these two extremes. Small and large values of $\varepsilon$ govern exploitation and exploration, respectively. By minimizing two benchmark functions and solving an inverse problem of a steel cantilever beam, we empirically show that $\varepsilon$-greedy TS equipped with an appropriate $\varepsilon$ is more robust than its two extremes, matching or outperforming the better of the generic TS and the sample-average TS.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑