arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2402.19255cs.CL
收藏

GSM-Plus:评估大型语言模型作为数学问题求解器鲁棒性的综合基准

GSM-Plus: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating the Robustness of LLMs as Mathematical Problem Solvers

The University of Hong Kong(香港大学);Tencent AI Lab(腾讯AI实验室)

Qintong Li, Leyang Cui, Xueliang Zhao, Lingpeng Kong, Wei Bi

AI总结:

本文提出GSM-Plus基准,通过对GSM8K施加多种数学扰动,系统评估25个LLMs在4种提示技术下的数学推理鲁棒性,并探索迭代生成与验证中间思路的组合提示方法。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLMs)已在各类数学推理基准上取得令人瞩目的性能。然而,关于这些模型究竟是真正理解并应用数学知识,还是仅依赖捷径进行数学推理,争论日益增多。一个关键且频繁出现的证据是,当数学问题稍有改动时,LLMs就可能表现错误。这促使我们通过测试广泛的问题变体来评估LLMs数学推理能力的鲁棒性。我们提出了对抗性小学数学(GSM-Plus)数据集,它是GSM8K的扩展,通过多种数学扰动进行增强。我们在25个LLMs和4种提示技术上的实验表明,尽管LLMs展现出不同水平的数学推理能力,但其性能远非鲁棒。具体而言,即使是在GSM8K中已经解决的问题,当添加新陈述或改变问题目标时,LLMs也会出错。我们还探究了通过组合现有提示方法能否获得更鲁棒的性能,其中尝试了一种迭代方法,根据推理目标和计算结果生成并验证每个中间思路。

英文摘要:

Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance across various mathematical reasoning benchmarks. However, there are increasing debates regarding whether these models truly understand and apply mathematical knowledge or merely rely on shortcuts for mathematical reasoning. One essential and frequently occurring evidence is that when the math questions are slightly changed, LLMs can behave incorrectly. This motivates us to evaluate the robustness of LLMs' math reasoning capability by testing a wide range of question variations. We introduce the adversarial grade school math (GSM-Plus) dataset, an extension of GSM8K augmented with various mathematical perturbations. Our experiments on 25 LLMs and 4 prompting techniques show that while LLMs exhibit different levels of math reasoning abilities, their performances are far from robust. In particular, even for problems that have been solved in GSM8K, LLMs can make mistakes when new statements are added or the question targets are altered. We also explore whether more robust performance can be achieved by composing existing prompting methods, in which we try an iterative method that generates and verifies each intermediate thought based on its reasoning goal and calculation result.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑