arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2402.18005cs.CLcs.AI

用于Meta-Review生成的情感整合框架

A Sentiment Consolidation Framework for Meta-Review Generation

School of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne(墨尔本大学计算与信息系统学院);Language Technologies Institute, Carnegie Mellon University(卡内基梅隆大学语言技术研究所)

Miao Li, Jey Han Lau, Eduard Hovy

AI总结:

本文针对科学领域meta-review生成任务,提出三层情感整合框架及LLM提示方法,通过实验验证该框架优于简单指令提示。

摘要:

配备大型语言模型(LLMs)的现代自然语言生成系统展现出生成多文档合理摘要的能力;然而,尚不确定它们是否真正具备信息整合能力以生成摘要,尤其是在处理包含主观意见信息的文档时。我们聚焦于meta-review生成,这是科学领域的一种情感摘要形式。为使科学情感摘要更具依据,我们假设人类meta-review作者遵循三层情感整合框架来撰写meta-review。基于该框架,我们提出了用于LLMs生成meta-review的新型提示方法,以及评估生成meta-review质量的评估指标。我们的框架通过实证得到验证:与使用简单指令提示LLMs相比,基于该框架提示LLMs能生成更好的meta-review。

英文摘要:

Modern natural language generation systems with Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit the capability to generate a plausible summary of multiple documents; however, it is uncertain if they truly possess the capability of information consolidation to generate summaries, especially on documents with opinionated information. We focus on meta-review generation, a form of sentiment summarisation for the scientific domain. To make scientific sentiment summarization more grounded, we hypothesize that human meta-reviewers follow a three-layer framework of sentiment consolidation to write meta-reviews. Based on the framework, we propose novel prompting methods for LLMs to generate meta-reviews and evaluation metrics to assess the quality of generated meta-reviews. Our framework is validated empirically as we find that prompting LLMs based on the framework -- compared with prompting them with simple instructions -- generates better meta-reviews.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑