arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2402.14992cs.CLcs.AIcs.LGstat.ML
收藏

tinyBenchmarks:用更少的示例评估大语言模型

tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examples

University of Michigan(密歇根大学);MIT(麻省理工学院);IBM Research(IBM研究院);MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab(麻省理工学院-IBM沃森人工智能实验室)

Felipe Maia Polo, Lucas Weber, Leshem Choshen, Yuekai Sun, Gongjun Xu, Mikhail Yurochkin

AI总结:

本文提出用少量精选示例评估大语言模型性能的方法,并发布tiny基准工具,证明其能高效可靠地复现原始评估结果。

摘要:

大语言模型(LLMs)的多功能性促使了多样化基准测试的创建,这些基准测试全面检验了各种语言模型的能力。这些基准包含数万个示例,使得评估LLMs变得非常昂贵。在本文中,我们研究了减少评估LLM在几个关键基准上性能所需评估次数的策略。例如,我们表明,要准确估计LLM在MMLU(一个包含14K示例的热门多项选择问答基准)上的性能,仅需在该LLM上评估100个精选示例即可。我们发布了评估工具和流行基准的tiny版本:Open LLM Leaderboard、MMLU、HELM和AlpacaEval 2.0。我们的实证分析表明,这些工具和tiny基准足以可靠且高效地复现原始评估结果。

英文摘要:

The versatility of large language models (LLMs) led to the creation of diverse benchmarks that thoroughly test a variety of language models' abilities. These benchmarks consist of tens of thousands of examples making evaluation of LLMs very expensive. In this paper, we investigate strategies to reduce the number of evaluations needed to assess the performance of an LLM on several key benchmarks. For example, we show that to accurately estimate the performance of an LLM on MMLU, a popular multiple-choice QA benchmark consisting of 14K examples, it is sufficient to evaluate this LLM on 100 curated examples. We release evaluation tools and tiny versions of popular benchmarks: Open LLM Leaderboard, MMLU, HELM, and AlpacaEval 2.0. Our empirical analysis demonstrates that these tools and tiny benchmarks are sufficient to reliably and efficiently reproduce the original evaluation results.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑