arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2402.14937cs.LGcs.CR
收藏

SoK:分析对抗样本——研究敌手知识的框架

SoK: Analyzing Adversarial Examples: A Framework to Study Adversary Knowledge

University of Waterloo(滑铁卢大学)

Lucas Fenaux, Florian Kerschbaum

AI总结:

本文针对图像分类对抗攻击中敌手知识缺乏形式化的问题,提出基于序理论和密码学博弈的标准化框架,系统分类近期攻击并揭示白盒与可迁移威胁模型难度的新结论。

摘要:

对抗样本是触发机器学习模型错误分类的恶意输入。这类攻击已被研究了近十年,我们发现,在发起攻击时,对敌手知识的研究和形式化存在不足。这导致攻击研究空间复杂,威胁模型和攻击难以比较。我们聚焦于图像分类领域,并受序理论工作的启发,提供了一个研究敌手知识的理论框架。我们提出了一个受密码学博弈启发的对抗样本博弈,以标准化攻击。我们调查了图像分类领域近期的攻击,并在我们的框架中对敌手的知识进行分类。通过这一系统化整理,我们汇总的结果既证实了关于敌手知识的既有看法,例如被攻击模型信息的重要性,也使我们能够得出关于白盒和可迁移威胁模型难度的新结论,例如,可迁移攻击可能并不像以前认为的那样困难。

英文摘要:

Adversarial examples are malicious inputs to machine learning models that trigger a misclassification. This type of attack has been studied for close to a decade, and we find that there is a lack of study and formalization of adversary knowledge when mounting attacks. This has yielded a complex space of attack research with hard-to-compare threat models and attacks. We focus on the image classification domain and provide a theoretical framework to study adversary knowledge inspired by work in order theory. We present an adversarial example game, inspired by cryptographic games, to standardize attacks. We survey recent attacks in the image classification domain and classify their adversary's knowledge in our framework. From this systematization, we compile results that both confirm existing beliefs about adversary knowledge, such as the potency of information about the attacked model as well as allow us to derive new conclusions on the difficulty associated with the white-box and transferable threat models, for example, that transferable attacks might not be as difficult as previously thought.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑