arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2402.13232cs.CVcs.RO

用于多模态对齐的触觉、视觉与语言数据集

A Touch, Vision, and Language Dataset for Multimodal Alignment

UC Berkeley(加州大学伯克利分校);Meta AI;TU Dresden(德累斯顿工业大学)

Letian Fu, Gaurav Datta, Huang Huang, William Chung-Ho Panitch, Jaimyn Drake, Joseph Ortiz, Mustafa Mukadam, Mike Lambeta, Roberto Calandra, Ken Goldberg

AI总结:

本文提出包含44K野外视觉-触觉对的数据集,训练触觉编码器和TVL模型,显著提升触觉-视觉-语言对齐与理解性能。

摘要:

触觉对人类而言是一种重要的感知模态,但尚未被纳入多模态生成式语言模型。部分原因在于难以获取触觉数据的自然语言标签,以及将触觉读数与视觉观察和语言描述对齐的复杂性。作为弥合这一差距的一步,本工作引入了一个包含44K个野外视觉-触觉对的新数据集,其中英语语言标签由人类标注(10%)和来自GPT-4V的文本伪标签(90%)组成。我们使用该数据集训练一个视觉-语言对齐的触觉编码器用于开放词汇分类,并训练一个触觉-视觉-语言(TVL)模型用于使用训练好的编码器进行文本生成。结果表明,通过引入触觉,TVL模型在触觉-视觉-语言对齐方面比现有在任何两种模态对上训练的模型提高了(+29%分类准确率)。尽管数据集中只有一小部分由人类标注,但TVL模型在新的触觉-视觉理解基准上展示出优于GPT-4V(+12%)和开源视觉-语言模型(+32%)的视觉-触觉理解能力。代码与数据:https://tactile-vlm.github.io。

英文摘要:

Touch is an important sensing modality for humans, but it has not yet been incorporated into a multimodal generative language model. This is partially due to the difficulty of obtaining natural language labels for tactile data and the complexity of aligning tactile readings with both visual observations and language descriptions. As a step towards bridging that gap, this work introduces a new dataset of 44K in-the-wild vision-touch pairs, with English language labels annotated by humans (10%) and textual pseudo-labels from GPT-4V (90%). We use this dataset to train a vision-language-aligned tactile encoder for open-vocabulary classification and a touch-vision-language (TVL) model for text generation using the trained encoder. Results suggest that by incorporating touch, the TVL model improves (+29% classification accuracy) touch-vision-language alignment over existing models trained on any pair of those modalities. Although only a small fraction of the dataset is human-labeled, the TVL model demonstrates improved visual-tactile understanding over GPT-4V (+12%) and open-source vision-language models (+32%) on a new touch-vision understanding benchmark. Code and data: https://tactile-vlm.github.io.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑