如果进行认识论解释,计算出的95%置信区间确实以0.95的概率覆盖真值
A computed 95% confidence interval does cover the true value with probability 0.95 if epistemically interpreted
AI总结:
本文针对特定计算置信区间的覆盖概率不明确问题,提出基于概率的认识论解释,证明已实现置信区间以置信水平给定的概率覆盖参数是有效陈述,除非样本存在相关且可识别的子集。
摘要:
假设测量了日常使用中一大样本电池的寿命。计算得到的置信区间为394加减1.96乘以4.6天。标准解释是,如果我们反复抽取样本并计算置信区间,大约95%的区间将覆盖未知的真实寿命。关于特定的区间394加减1.96乘以4.6能说明什么,此前一直不清楚。我们通过使用概率的认识论解释来澄清这一点。结论是,已实现的(计算出的)置信区间以置信水平给定的概率覆盖参数是一个有效的陈述,除非样本中存在相关且可识别的子集。
英文摘要:
Suppose the lifetime of a large sample of batteries in routine use is measured. A confidence interval is computed to 394 plus/minus 1.96 times 4.6 days. The standard interpretation is that if we repeatedly draw samples and compute confidence intervals, about 95% of the intervals will cover the unknown true lifetime. What can be said about the particular interval 394 plus/minus 1.96 times 4.6 has not been clear. We clarify this by using an epistemic interpretation of probability. The conclusion is that a realised (computed) confidence interval covers the parameter with the probability given by the confidence level is a valid statement, unless there are relevant and recognisable subsets of the sample.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。