arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2402.09657cs.ITcs.LGcs.NImath.IT

无线网络中联邦学习的数字传输与模拟传输对比

Digital versus Analog Transmissions for Federated Learning over Wireless Networks

Southeast University(东南大学);Purple Mountain Laboratories(紫金山实验室);Zhejiang University(浙江大学);University of Oulu(奥卢大学);Princeton University(普林斯顿大学)

Jiacheng Yao, Wei Xu, Zhaohui Yang, Xiaohu You, Mehdi Bennis, H. Vincent Poor

AI总结:

本文在无线联邦学习场景下定量对比数字与模拟传输方案,揭示其根本区别在于通信与计算是否联合设计,并通过理论分析和数值仿真验证了各自优劣及适用场景。

摘要:

本文定量比较了资源受限网络中无线联邦学习(FL)的两种有效通信方案,即数字传输和模拟传输,重点揭示它们的本质差异以及各自适用的应用场景。我们首先考察数字和模拟传输方法,并在实际约束条件下建立统一且公平的比较框架。针对无线网络中FL性能评估,建立了在各种非理想因素下的通用收敛性分析。这些分析结果表明,两种范式的根本区别在于通信与计算是否进行联合设计。数字方案将通信设计与具体FL任务解耦,使得在有限带宽下难以支持海量设备的同时上行传输。相比之下,模拟通信允许空中计算(AirComp),从而实现高效的频谱利用。然而,面向计算的模拟传输会降低功率效率,且其性能对计算误差较为敏感。最后,通过数值仿真验证了上述理论观察。

英文摘要:

In this paper, we quantitatively compare these two effective communication schemes, i.e., digital and analog ones, for wireless federated learning (FL) over resource-constrained networks, highlighting their essential differences as well as their respective application scenarios. We first examine both digital and analog transmission methods, together with a unified and fair comparison scheme under practical constraints. A universal convergence analysis under various imperfections is established for FL performance evaluation in wireless networks. These analytical results reveal that the fundamental difference between the two paradigms lies in whether communication and computation are jointly designed or not. The digital schemes decouple the communication design from specific FL tasks, making it difficult to support simultaneous uplink transmission of massive devices with limited bandwidth. In contrast, the analog communication allows over-the-air computation (AirComp), thus achieving efficient spectrum utilization. However, computation-oriented analog transmission reduces power efficiency, and its performance is sensitive to computational errors. Finally, numerical simulations are conducted to verify these theoretical observations.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑