研究的可重复性、可复现性与透明度：美国和印度各大学430位教授的看法
Reproducibility, Replicability, and Transparency in Research: What 430 Professors Think in Universities across the USA and India
AI总结：
通过调查美国和印度430位教授，本研究揭示了可重复性与可复现性方面的国家及学科差异，并建议解决科学诚信问题的方案应以文化为中心，兼顾地域与领域要素。
摘要：
在过去十年中，开放科学与科学学社区发起了创新举措，以应对已发表科学研究的可重复性和可复现性方面的担忧。在某些方面，这些努力取得了成功，但仍有许多研究者群体对这些担忧、后续应对措施，或参与可重复、可复现及可靠研究的最佳实践知之甚少或一无所知。在这项工作中，我们调查了来自美国和印度各大学的430位教授，以了解对科学过程的看法并确定干预的关键点。我们的发现揭示了在关注可重复性和可复现性方面存在国家和学科差异，且因激励错位和资源限制而加剧。我们建议，解决科学诚信问题的方案应以文化为中心，其中文化的定义应包括地域和特定领域的要素。
英文摘要：
In the past decade, open science and science of science communities have initiated innovative efforts to address concerns about the reproducibility and replicability of published scientific research. In some respects, these efforts have been successful, yet there are still many pockets of researchers with little to no familiarity with these concerns, subsequent responses, or best practices for engaging in reproducible, replicable, and reliable scholarship. In this work, we survey 430 professors from Universities across the USA and India to understand perspectives on scientific processes and identify key points for intervention. Our findings reveal both national and disciplinary gaps in attention to reproducibility and replicability, aggravated by incentive misalignment and resource constraints. We suggest that solutions addressing scientific integrity should be culturally-centered, where definitions of culture should include both regional and domain-specific elements.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
