arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2402.08088cs.AIcs.LGeess.IV
收藏

使用统计过程控制的分布外检测与数据漂移监控

Out-of-Distribution Detection and Data Drift Monitoring using Statistical Process Control

Office of Science and Engineering Laboratories(科学与工程实验室办公室);Center for Devices and Radiological Health(设备与放射健康中心);U.S. Food and Drug Administration(美国食品药品监督管理局);Johns Hopkins University(约翰斯·霍普金斯大学);University of Maryland(马里兰大学);University of Maryland School of Medicine(马里兰大学医学院)

Ghada Zamzmi, Kesavan Venkatesh, Brandon Nelson, Smriti Prathapan, Paul H. Yi, Berkman Sahiner, Jana G. Delfino

AI总结:

提出一种基于ML的统计过程控制框架,用于分布外检测与数据漂移监控,在CT和CXR任务中取得高准确率,且对数据、模态和模型不可知。

摘要:

背景:机器学习(ML)方法在处理偏离其训练分布的数据时往往会失败。这对于临床环境中的ML设备来说是一个重大隐患,因为数据漂移可能导致意想不到的性能下降,从而危及患者安全。方法:我们提出了一种基于ML的统计过程控制(SPC)框架,用于分布外(OOD)检测和漂移监控。SPC的优势在于它能以可视化和统计的方式突出显示与预期分布的偏差。为了证明所提框架在监控放射图像数据漂移方面的效用,我们研究了不同的设计选择,包括提取特征表示的方法、漂移量化和SPC参数选择。结果:我们展示了该框架在两个任务上的有效性:1)区分轴位与非轴位计算机断层扫描(CT)图像,以及2)将胸部X射线(CXR)与其他模态分离。对于这两项任务,我们在检测OOD输入方面都取得了很高的准确率,CT为0.913,CXR为0.995,灵敏度在CT中为0.980,在CXR中为0.984。我们的框架还擅长监控数据流并识别漂移发生的时间。在每日100例CXR病例的模拟中,我们在两天内检测到了OOD输入百分比从0-1%到3-5%的漂移,并保持了较低的误报率。通过额外的实验结果,我们证明了该框架的数据不可知特性及其对底层模型结构的独立性。结论:我们提出了一个用于OOD检测和漂移监控的框架,该框架对数据、模态和模型均不可知。该框架是可定制的,并且可以适应特定的应用。

英文摘要:

Background: Machine learning (ML) methods often fail with data that deviates from their training distribution. This is a significant concern for ML-enabled devices in clinical settings, where data drift may cause unexpected performance that jeopardizes patient safety. Method: We propose a ML-enabled Statistical Process Control (SPC) framework for out-of-distribution (OOD) detection and drift monitoring. SPC is advantageous as it visually and statistically highlights deviations from the expected distribution. To demonstrate the utility of the proposed framework for monitoring data drift in radiological images, we investigated different design choices, including methods for extracting feature representations, drift quantification, and SPC parameter selection. Results: We demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework for two tasks: 1) differentiating axial vs. non-axial computed tomography (CT) images and 2) separating chest x-ray (CXR) from other modalities. For both tasks, we achieved high accuracy in detecting OOD inputs, with 0.913 in CT and 0.995 in CXR, and sensitivity of 0.980 in CT and 0.984 in CXR. Our framework was also adept at monitoring data streams and identifying the time a drift occurred. In a simulation with 100 daily CXR cases, we detected a drift in OOD input percentage from 0-1% to 3-5% within two days, maintaining a low false-positive rate. Through additional experimental results, we demonstrate the framework's data-agnostic nature and independence from the underlying model's structure. Conclusion: We propose a framework for OOD detection and drift monitoring that is agnostic to data, modality, and model. The framework is customizable and can be adapted for specific applications.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑