arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2402.07262cs.CLcs.HC
收藏

印度语系低资源反制言论生成:以孟加拉语和印地语为例

Low-Resource Counterspeech Generation for Indic Languages: The Case of Bengali and Hindi

Mithun Das, Saurabh Kumar Pandey, Shivansh Sethi, Punyajoy Saha, Animesh Mukherjee

AI总结:

针对孟加拉语和印地语等低资源语言的反制言论生成问题,构建了包含5062对数据的基准数据集,并评估多种跨语言迁移基线模型,发现单语设置效果最佳且同语系语言间的合成迁移效果更好。

摘要:

随着网络虐待的兴起,NLP社区已开始研究使用神经架构生成反制言论,以“反制”此类虐待言论的恶意语气,并削弱/减轻其在社交网络上的连锁反应。然而,目前的大多数努力主要集中在英语上。为了弥合孟加拉语和印地语等低资源语言的差距,我们创建了一个包含5,062对虐待言论/反制言论的基准数据集,其中2,460对为孟加拉语,2,602对为印地语。我们考虑了各种跨语言迁移机制的不同配置,实现了多个基线模型,以生成合适的反制言论,从而建立有效的基准。我们观察到,单语设置产生了最佳性能。此外,使用合成迁移,语言模型能在一定程度上生成反制言论;具体而言,我们注意到当语言属于同一语系时,可迁移性更好。

英文摘要:

With the rise of online abuse, the NLP community has begun investigating the use of neural architectures to generate counterspeech that can "counter" the vicious tone of such abusive speech and dilute/ameliorate their rippling effect over the social network. However, most of the efforts so far have been primarily focused on English. To bridge the gap for low-resource languages such as Bengali and Hindi, we create a benchmark dataset of 5,062 abusive speech/counterspeech pairs, of which 2,460 pairs are in Bengali and 2,602 pairs are in Hindi. We implement several baseline models considering various interlingual transfer mechanisms with different configurations to generate suitable counterspeech to set up an effective benchmark. We observe that the monolingual setup yields the best performance. Further, using synthetic transfer, language models can generate counterspeech to some extent; specifically, we notice that transferability is better when languages belong to the same language family.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑