arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
北美退伍军人节(Veterans Day),12 日无更新
arXiv 2402.05129cs.CL
收藏

大型语言模型文本标注的最佳实践

Best Practices for Text Annotation with Large Language Models

University of Amsterdam(阿姆斯特丹大学)

Petter Törnberg

AI总结:

本文针对LLM文本标注缺乏标准的问题,提出涵盖模型选择、提示工程、验证及伦理考量等全面最佳实践,确保标注可靠、可重复且合乎伦理。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLMs)开启了文本标注的新时代,因其易用性、高准确率和相对较低的成本,其使用在近几个月内激增。然而,该领域的快速发展意味着基于LLM的标注已变得有点像学术界的“狂野西部”:缺乏既定实践和标准,引发了对研究质量和有效性的担忧。研究人员警告说,LLMs表面上的简单性可能具有误导性,因为它们容易产生偏见、误解和不可靠的结果。认识到LLMs的变革潜力,本文提出了一套全面的标准和最佳实践,以确保其可靠、可重复和合乎伦理的使用。这些指南涵盖了关键领域,如模型选择、提示工程、结构化提示、提示稳定性分析、严格的模型验证,以及伦理和法律影响的考量。本文强调需要一种结构化、定向和形式化的LLM使用方法,旨在确保文本标注实践的完整性和稳健性,并倡导在社会科学研究中与LLMs进行细致和批判性的接触。

英文摘要:

Large Language Models (LLMs) have ushered in a new era of text annotation, as their ease-of-use, high accuracy, and relatively low costs have meant that their use has exploded in recent months. However, the rapid growth of the field has meant that LLM-based annotation has become something of an academic Wild West: the lack of established practices and standards has led to concerns about the quality and validity of research. Researchers have warned that the ostensible simplicity of LLMs can be misleading, as they are prone to bias, misunderstandings, and unreliable results. Recognizing the transformative potential of LLMs, this paper proposes a comprehensive set of standards and best practices for their reliable, reproducible, and ethical use. These guidelines span critical areas such as model selection, prompt engineering, structured prompting, prompt stability analysis, rigorous model validation, and the consideration of ethical and legal implications. The paper emphasizes the need for a structured, directed, and formalized approach to using LLMs, aiming to ensure the integrity and robustness of text annotation practices, and advocates for a nuanced and critical engagement with LLMs in social scientific research.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑