arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2402.04670physics.flu-dyncs.NAmath-phmath.MPmath.NA

不可压缩两相流中表面张力贡献计算的不同方法比较

A comparison of different approaches to compute surface tension contribution in incompressible two-phase flows

Giuseppe Orlando, Paolo Francesco Barbante, Luca Bonaventura

AI总结:

该研究使用守恒水平集(CLS)方法定量评估了不可压缩两相流中表面张力贡献的不同计算策略,对比经典曲率计算方法与新提出的平均曲率演化方程,通过静态和振荡气泡测试案例展示各方法优缺点。

摘要:

我们使用守恒水平集(CLS)方法,对不可压缩两相流中计算表面张力贡献的不同策略进行了定量评估。具体而言,我们将经典方法(如从水平集直接计算曲率或使用拉普拉斯-贝尔特拉米算子)与文献中最近提出的平均曲率演化方程进行了比较。我们考虑了静态气泡(其界面压力跃变有精确解)和振荡气泡两个测试案例,展示了不同方法的优缺点。

英文摘要:

We perform a quantitative assessment of different strategies to compute the contribution due to surface tension in incompressible two-phase flows using a conservative level set (CLS) method. More specifically, we compare classical approaches, such as the direct computation of the curvature from the level set or the Laplace-Beltrami operator, with an evolution equation for the mean curvature recently proposed in literature. We consider the test case of a static bubble, for which an exact solution for the pressure jump across the interface is available, and the test case of an oscillating bubble, showing pros and cons of the different approaches.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑