量子泛原心论与组合问题
Quantum panprotopsychism and the combination problem
AI总结：
本文基于现象学分析和量子本体论，论证量子泛原心论能更好地解释意识，并指出经典物理学隐含的随附性假设是组合问题的根源，进而为大脑中量子认知机制的实现提出约束条件。
摘要：
我们将论证，一种类似于胡塞尔的现象学意识分析表明，现象性质的效果塑造了我们对世界的感知。它也展示了物理科学和数学科学运作的方式，使我们能够用可交流的数学定律来准确描述所观察到的规律性。后者对事物的内在特征一无所言。它们只涉及所观察到的行为规律性，提供对宇宙如何运作的严格描述，任何可行的本体论都必须与之相符。经典机械决定论将一切可能发生的事物限制在瞬间发生的内容上，不给新颖性或任何非副现象的内在方面留下空间。如果认真对待从其公理中产生的本体论——对象、处于特定状态的系统以及它们在其他对象中产生的事件——那么情况会随着量子概率决定论而改变。正如伯特兰·罗素近一个世纪前所指出的，一种具有内在现象方面的事件本体论，现在被称为泛原心论，更适合解释意识的现象方面。本文的核心观察是，许多对泛心论和泛原心论的反对意见，通常被称为组合问题，源于基于经典物理学的关于随附性的隐含假设。这些假设在量子层面是不恰当的，因为在量子层面会出现指数级数量的涌现性质和状态。该分析对大脑中量子认知机制的可能实现方式施加了条件。
英文摘要：
We will argue that a phenomenological analysis of consciousness, similar to that of Husserl, shows that the effects of phenomenal qualities shape our perception of the world. It also shows the way the physical and mathematical sciences operate, allowing us to accurately describe the observed regularities in terms of communicable mathematical laws. The latter say nothing about the intrinsic features of things. They only refer to the observed regularities in their behaviors, providing rigorous descriptions of how the universe works, to which any viable ontology must conform. Classical mechanistic determinism limits everything that can occur to what happens in an instant and leaves no room for novelty or any intrinsic aspect that is not epiphenomenal. The situation changes with quantum probabilistic determinism if one takes seriously the ontology that arises from its axioms of objects, systems in certain states, and the events they produce in other objects. As Bertrand Russell pointed out almost a century ago, an ontology of events, with an internal phenomenal aspect, now known as panprotopsychism, is better suited to explaining the phenomenal aspects of consciousness. The central observation of this paper is that many objections to panpsychism and panprotopsychism, which are usually called the combination problem, arise from implicit hypotheses based on classical physics about supervenience. These are inappropriate at the quantum level, where an exponential number of emergent properties and states arise. The analysis imposes conditions on the possible implementations of quantum cognition mechanisms in the brain.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
