arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2402.03328cs.CVcs.AIcs.NE

视觉枚举对多模态生成式AI而言仍具挑战性

Visual Enumeration Remains Challenging for Multimodal Generative AI

Department of General Psychology and Department of Mathematics University of Padova(帕多瓦大学心理学系和数学系);Department of General Psychology University of Padova(帕多瓦大学心理学系);Department of General Psychology and Padova Neuroscience Center University of Padova(帕多瓦大学心理学系和帕多瓦神经科学中心);IRCSS San Camillo Hospital, Venice-Lido(威尼斯利多医院IRCSS桑卡莫医院)

Alberto Testolin, Kuinan Hou, Marco Zorzi

AI总结:

本文提出受认知科学启发的视觉枚举基准,评估多模态基础模型的识数与计数能力,发现先进模型在识别和生成目标数量物体时仍表现不佳。

摘要:

许多动物物种能够在一瞥之间近似判断视觉场景中物体的数量,而人类还可以通过运用系统性的计数程序,进一步确定一个集合的确切基数。相比之下,已有观察发现,即使是最先进的AI系统,其枚举技能也非常有限。在本研究中,我们受认知科学启发提出了两个基准任务,可精确评估多模态基础模型的视觉枚举能力,从而为其数感和计数水平提供客观度量。我们考察了流行的视觉问答模型(BLIP、LLaVA和ViLT),以及先进的图像到文本(Gemini、GPT和Qwen)和文本到图像(DALL-E、FLUX和Stable Diffusion)AI系统。分析表明,即使是最先进的模型,也无法可靠地说出简单视觉刺激中的物体数量,或生成包含目标数量项目的图像;这两类任务中的低准确率可作为指标。尤其在subitizing(快速数感)范围之外的数字上,其响应往往与目标数量相差甚远;而且与人类行为形成鲜明对比的是,在许多情况下误差分布取决于物体类别。我们还观察到在小数字上出现的一些显著错误。研究结果表明,发展对数字的直观视觉理解对AI模型而言仍然具有挑战性,而仅仅扩大模型规模可能并不是促进系统性计数技能涌现的可行策略。我们发布了该基准的完整代码,以促进未来AI系统的枚举技能评估。

英文摘要:

Many animal species can approximately judge the number of objects in a visual scene at a single glance, and humans can further determine the exact cardinality of a set by deploying systematic counting procedures. In contrast, it has been observed that even state-of-the-art AI systems have very limited enumeration skills. In this work, we propose two benchmark tasks inspired by cognitive science that allow to precisely evaluate the visual enumeration capabilities of multimodal foundation models, thereby providing an objective measure of their number sense and counting level. We consider popular visual question answering models (BLIP, LLaVA and ViLT) as well as advanced image-to-text (Gemini, GPT and Qwen) and text-to-image (DALL-E, FLUX and Stable Diffusion) AI systems. Our analyses show that even the most advanced models cannot reliably name the number of objects in simple visual stimuli or generate images containing a target number of items, as indexed by their low accuracy in both types of tasks. Especially for numbers outside the subitizing range, their responses are often far from the target numerosity, and, in stark contrast with human behavior, in many cases the distribution of errors depends on the object category. We also observe some striking mistakes with small numbers. Our findings demonstrate that developing an intuitive visual understanding of number remains challenging for AI models and that merely increasing model size might not be a viable strategy to promote the emergence of systematic counting skills. We release the full code of our benchmark to facilitate the evaluation of enumeration skills in future AI systems.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑