非社会性智能：对AGI话语假设的考察
Unsocial Intelligence: an Investigation of the Assumptions of AGI Discourse
AI总结：
本文考察了AGI定义中隐含的社会政治与伦理假设，通过构建分类法揭示其技术化框架背后的价值选择，并借鉴女性主义与STS研究，提出了情境化、民主化和参与式的未来机器智能发展路径。
摘要：
自AI领域诞生以来，机器匹敌人类智能的梦想便塑造了该领域。然而，人类水平的AI或通用人工智能（AGI）的确切含义仍然难以捉摸且备受争议。AGI的定义包含了各种不相容的价值观和假设。应对AGI话语中破碎的世界观，对于追求不同价值观和未来的批判至关重要。为此，我们提供了一个AGI定义的分类法，为考察它们所做的关键社会、政治和伦理假设奠定了基础。我们强调了这些定义将AGI或人类水平的AI界定为技术议题的实例，并揭示了其中隐含做出的价值选择。借鉴女性主义、STS（科学技术研究）以及关于人类与机器智能的政治和社会特征的社会科学研究，我们提出了想象未来机器智能形式的情境化、民主化和参与式路径。未来AI形式的开发必须明确关注其编码的价值观、其包容或排斥的人群，以及对认知正义的承诺。
英文摘要：
Dreams of machines rivaling human intelligence have shaped the field of AI since its inception. Yet, the very meaning of human-level AI or artificial general intelligence (AGI) remains elusive and contested. Definitions of AGI embrace a diverse range of incompatible values and assumptions. Contending with the fractured worldviews of AGI discourse is vital for critiques that pursue different values and futures. To that end, we provide a taxonomy of AGI definitions, laying the ground for examining the key social, political, and ethical assumptions they make. We highlight instances in which these definitions frame AGI or human-level AI as a technical topic and expose the value-laden choices being implicitly made. Drawing on feminist, STS, and social science scholarship on the political and social character of intelligence in both humans and machines, we propose contextual, democratic, and participatory paths to imagining future forms of machine intelligence. The development of future forms of AI must involve explicit attention to the values it encodes, the people it includes or excludes, and a commitment to epistemic justice.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
