乌拉圭科技学科中的显性比较优势
Revealed comparative advantages in scientific and technological disciplines in Uruguay
AI总结：
基于Scopus 1996-2019年文献计量数据，本文通过比较各领域在国家和全球科学产出中的份额，揭示了乌拉圭在健康、生命、物理及社会科学等特定学科中的显性比较优势（RCA）。
摘要：
基于Scopus数据库1996-2019年期间的文献计量信息，本文刻画了乌拉圭科学产出的演变，并确定了该国具有显性比较优势（RCA）的领域。在方法论上，如果某领域在全国科学产出中所占份额大于该领域在世界科学产出中所占份额，则提出该领域存在RCA。所呈现的证据考虑了科学产出的两种测度方式（已发表论文和引用量）以及领域层面的三个聚合水平（包含5个大领域的粗略层面、包含27个学科的较详细层面，以及包含300多个细分类别的更精细层面）。在健康科学中，兽医学、护理学和医学存在RCA。在生命科学中，农业与生物科学、免疫学与微生物学以及生物化学、遗传学与分子生物学存在RCA。在物理科学中，仅在环境科学存在RCA；而在社会科学中，仅在经济学、计量经济学与金融学存在RCA。
英文摘要：
Based on bibliometric information from Scopus for the period 1996-2019, this document characterizes the evolution of Uruguayan scientific production and establishes the areas in which the country has a revealed comparative advantage (RCA). Methodologically, it is proposed that there is a RCA in an area if this area has a greater share in national scientific production than the share of the area in world scientific production. The evidence presented considers two measurements of scientific production (published articles and citations) and three levels of aggregation in the areas (a minor one with 5 large areas, a more detailed one with 27 disciplines and another even more granular with more than 300 disaggregations). Within Health Sciences there is a RCA in Veterinary, Nursing and Medicine. Within Life Sciences there is a RCA in Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Immunology and Microbiology and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. In Physical Sciences there is only a RCA in Environmental Science and in Social Sciences only in Economics, Econometrics and Finance.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
