arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2401.04435cs.CV

面向长尾半监督学习的不确定性感知采样

Uncertainty-aware Sampling for Long-tailed Semi-supervised Learning

East China Normal University(华东师范大学);Kargobot of DiDi(滴滴出行Kargobot);Shanghai Jiao Tong University(上海交通大学);Tsinghua Berkeley Shenzhen Institute(清华大学深圳国际研究生院(清华-伯克利深圳学院));Toronto Metropolitan University(多伦多都会大学)

Kuo Yang, Duo Li, Menghan Hu, Guangtao Zhai, Xiaokang Yang, Xiao-Ping Zhang

AI总结:

针对长尾半监督学习中伪标签可靠性随训练阶段变化的问题,提出不确定性感知动态阈值选择方法(UDTS),自适应调整各类别伪标签选择阈值,在多个图像数据集上显著提升准确率。

摘要:

对于具有类别不平衡的半监督学习,数据的长尾分布会增加模型对主导类别的预测偏置,从而削弱在较少出现类别上的性能。现有方法在确保为模型训练选择足够可靠的伪标签方面也面临挑战,并且缺乏根据不同训练阶段调整更可靠伪标签选择的机制。为缓解这一问题,我们将不确定性引入伪标签采样的建模过程中,考虑到模型在尾部类别上的性能在不同训练阶段会有所变化。例如,在模型训练的早期阶段,模型有限的预测准确率会导致不确定伪标签的比例较高。为了应对这一点,我们提出了一种不确定性感知动态阈值选择(UDTS)方法。该方法使模型能够感知不同训练阶段伪标签的不确定性,从而自适应地调整不同类别的选择阈值。与 FixMatch 等基线方法相比,UDTS 在自然场景图像数据集 CIFAR10-LT、CIFAR100-LT、STL-10-LT 和医学图像数据集 TissueMNIST 上的准确率分别至少提升了约 5.26%、1.75%、9.96% 和 1.28%。UDTS 的源代码已公开于:https://github.com/yangk/UDTS。

英文摘要:

For semi-supervised learning with imbalance classes, the long-tailed distribution of data will increase the model prediction bias toward dominant classes, undermining performance on less frequent classes. Existing methods also face challenges in ensuring the selection of sufficiently reliable pseudo-labels for model training and there is a lack of mechanisms to adjust the selection of more reliable pseudo-labels based on different training stages. To mitigate this issue, we introduce uncertainty into the modeling process for pseudo-label sampling, taking into account that the model performance on the tailed classes varies over different training stages. For example, at the early stage of model training, the limited predictive accuracy of model results in a higher rate of uncertain pseudo-labels. To counter this, we propose an Uncertainty-Aware Dynamic Threshold Selection (UDTS) approach. This approach allows the model to perceive the uncertainty of pseudo-labels at different training stages, thereby adaptively adjusting the selection thresholds for different classes. Compared to other methods such as the baseline method FixMatch, UDTS achieves an increase in accuracy of at least approximately 5.26%, 1.75%, 9.96%, and 1.28% on the natural scene image datasets CIFAR10-LT, CIFAR100-LT, STL-10-LT, and the medical image dataset TissueMNIST, respectively. The source code of UDTS is publicly available at: https://github.com/yangk/UDTS.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑