arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2401.02816cs.RO

用于人形机器人定位与建图的RGB-D SLAM方法比较评估

Comparative Evaluation of RGB-D SLAM Methods for Humanoid Robot Localization and Mapping

University of Tehran(德黑兰大学)

Amirhosein Vedadi, Aghil Yousefi-Koma, Parsa Yazdankhah, Amin Mozayyan

AI总结:

本文比较评估了RTAB-Map、ORB-SLAM3和OpenVSLAM在SURENA-V人形机器人上的定位与建图表现,发现ORB-SLAM3定位精度最高,RTAB-Map建图能力最强,而OpenVSLAM具备良好的闭环检测与重定位能力。

摘要:

本文对三种RGB-D SLAM(同步定位与建图)算法:RTAB-Map、ORB-SLAM3和OpenVSLAM进行了比较评估,以用于SURENA-V人形机器人的定位与建图。我们的测试涉及机器人遵循完整的圆形路径,其头部安装了Intel RealSense D435 RGB-D相机。在评估定位精度时,ORB-SLAM3以0.1073的ATE表现最佳,其次是RTAB-Map(0.1641)和OpenVSLAM(0.1847)。然而,需要注意的是,当机器人遇到特征点有限的墙壁时,ORB-SLAM3和OpenVSLAM在维持精确里程计方面均面临挑战。尽管如此,OpenVSLAM展现了检测闭环并在机器人接近初始位置时成功在地图中重新定位自身的能力。调查还延伸至建图能力,其中RTAB-Map表现突出,提供了多样化的建图输出,包括稠密地图、OctoMap和占据栅格地图。相比之下,ORB-SLAM3和OpenVSLAM仅提供稀疏地图。

英文摘要:

In this paper, we conducted a comparative evaluation of three RGB-D SLAM (Simultaneous Localization and Mapping) algorithms: RTAB-Map, ORB-SLAM3, and OpenVSLAM for SURENA-V humanoid robot localization and mapping. Our test involves the robot to follow a full circular pattern, with an Intel RealSense D435 RGB-D camera installed on its head. In assessing localization accuracy, ORB-SLAM3 outperformed the others with an ATE of 0.1073, followed by RTAB-Map at 0.1641 and OpenVSLAM at 0.1847. However, it should be noted that both ORB-SLAM3 and OpenVSLAM faced challenges in maintaining accurate odometry when the robot encountered a wall with limited feature points. Nevertheless, OpenVSLAM demonstrated the ability to detect loop closures and successfully relocalize itself within the map when the robot approached its initial location. The investigation also extended to mapping capabilities, where RTAB-Map excelled by offering diverse mapping outputs, including dense, OctoMap, and occupancy grid maps. In contrast, both ORB-SLAM3 and OpenVSLAM provided only sparse maps.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑