年复一年：在计算机科学中泛滥的受折磨会议系列
Year after year: Tortured conference series thriving in Computer Science
AI总结：
本文利用“Problematic Paper Screener”筛查包含同义词无意义改写的存疑文章，发现在IEEE会议中存在连续版本不断接收此类文章的“受折磨会议系列”现象。
摘要：
“Problematic Paper Screener”（PPS, WCRI'22, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.04895）标记了1.2万+篇包含受折磨短语的存疑文章，例如用“glucose bigotry”代替“glucose intolerance”。它每天使用包含4k个已知反映同义词无意义改写的受折磨短语列表来筛查文献中的“指纹”。我们在IEEE会议中发现了“受折磨文章”的集中现象，并于2022年11月报告了担忧（https://retractionwatch.com/?p=127299）。本次WCRI投稿揭示了“受折磨会议系列”：在连续会议版本中不断被接收的存疑文章。
英文摘要：
The 'Problematic Paper Screener' (PPS, WCRI'22, https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.04895) flagged 12k+ questionable articles featuring tortured phrases, such as 'glucose bigotry' instead of 'glucose intolerance.' It daily screens the literature for 'fingerprints' from a list of 4k tortured phrases known to reflect nonsensical paraphrasing with synonyms. We identified a concentration of 'tortured articles' in IEEE conferences and reported our concerns in November 2022 (https://retractionwatch.com/?p=127299). This WCRI submission unveils 'tortured conference series': questionable articles that keep being accepted in successive conference editions.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
