真实与非真实地方新闻机构的在线策略比较
Comparison of Online Maneuvers by Authentic and Inauthentic Local News Organizations
AI总结：
本研究应用BEND框架对比pink slime（非真实地方新闻）与真实地方新闻在Facebook的分享策略，发现二者在正面叙事、转移注意力的使用场景及中和策略的应用上存在显著差异，揭示了非真实地方新闻的舆论操纵特点。
摘要：
非真实地方新闻机构，也被称为“粉红肉泥（pink slime）”，自2020年美国总统大选前出现以来，已成为利用地方新闻公信力的严重问题。本文应用BEND框架（一种将社交媒体帖子分类为16种网络与叙事策略的方法），对比pink slime网站与真实地方新闻网站在Facebook主页上的分享差异。研究发现，pink slime网站采用的正面叙事策略多于地方新闻分享者。两类新闻都使用了转移注意力（distraction）策略，但目的不同：pink slime将其用于针对地方和州级选举，而真实地方新闻则聚焦于全国性选举和政治人物。此外，地方新闻采用中和（neutralize）策略以降低围绕全国性政客的正面情绪。
英文摘要：
Inauthentic local news organizations, otherwise known as pink slime, have become a serious problem exploiting the trust of local news since their creation ahead of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election. In this paper, we apply the BEND framework, a methodology of classifying social media posts as belonging to sixteen network and narrative maneuvers, to compare and contrast how pink slime sites and authentic local news sites are shared on Facebook Pages. It finds that pink slime sites implemented more positive narrative maneuvers than those of local news sharers. Both news types utilized distraction but to fulfill separate goals - pink slime used it against local and state elections while authentic local news focused on national elections and figureheads. Furthermore, local news employed the neutralize tactic in order to reduce positive sentiment around national politicians.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
