arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2312.02488cs.RO
收藏

具有分层保守技能推理的不确定性感知共享自主系统的设计与评估

Design and Evaluation of an Uncertainty-Aware Shared-Autonomy System with Hierarchical Conservative Skill Inference

Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI)(电子电信研究所)

Taewoo Kim, Donghyung Kim, Minsu Jang, Jaehong Kim

AI总结:

针对现有共享自主模仿学习忽略操作者认知负荷与干预风险的问题,提出带分层保守技能推理的不确定性感知系统,搭配开源VR遥操作流水线,在动态场景任务中实现高成功率并减少碰撞,验证了设计有效性。

摘要:

共享自主模仿学习允许人类实时纠正机器人,从而缓解协变量偏移误差。然而现有方法忽略了两个关键因素:(i)操作者的认知负荷,以及(ii)延迟或错误干预带来的风险。我们提出了一种不确定性感知共享自主系统,其中机器人根据学习到的潜空间技能不确定性估计来调整其行为。一个分层策略首先推理出保守的技能嵌入,再将其解码为底层动作,在实现快速任务执行的同时,能在不确定性较高时自动减速。我们详细介绍了一套完整的开源VR遥操作流水线,它兼容UR系列机械臂等多构型操作器。在倾倒和拾取放置任务上的实验表明,系统在存在移动目标的动态场景中成功率达70-90%;定性研究显示,与非保守基线相比,碰撞事件显著减少。尽管出于安全和成本原因,在硬件上单独开展隔离不确定性的消融实验并不现实,但已报告的稳定性提升和操作者工作负荷降低已验证了该设计的合理性,并为未来的大规模研究提供了动力。

英文摘要:

Shared-autonomy imitation learning lets a human correct a robot in real time, mitigating covariate-shift errors. Yet existing approaches ignore two critical factors: (i) the operator's cognitive load and (ii) the risk created by delayed or erroneous interventions. We present an uncertainty-aware shared-autonomy system in which the robot modulates its behaviour according to a learned estimate of latent-space skill uncertainty. A hierarchical policy first infers a conservative skill embedding and then decodes it into low-level actions, enabling rapid task execution while automatically slowing down when uncertainty is high. We detail a full, open-source VR-teleoperation pipeline that is compatible with multi-configuration manipulators such as UR-series arms. Experiments on pouring and pick-and-place tasks demonstrate 70-90% success in dynamic scenes with moving targets, and a qualitative study shows a marked reduction in collision events compared with a non-conservative baseline. Although a dedicated ablation that isolates uncertainty is impractical on hardware for safety and cost reasons, the reported gains in stability and operator workload already validate the design and motivate future large-scale studies.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑