arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2312.02422physics.ed-ph
收藏

ChatGPT 在课堂中:对物理学生学业表现是利是弊?

ChatGPT in the Classroom: Boon or Bane for Physics Students' Academic Performance?

Manuel G. Forero, H. J. Herrera-Suárez

AI总结:

本文通过工程物理课程对照实验发现,将 ChatGPT 作为学习工具会显著降低学生成绩并产生负 Hake 因子,同时学生对其作用看法矛盾,提示应将其谨慎用作传统教学的补充而非替代。

摘要:

本研究考察了基于人工智能的语言模型 ChatGPT 对物理课程中学生表现的影响。我们在一门第二学期的工程物理课程中对两组学生进行了实验分析。对照组(Physics 2 2022B)采用传统教学方法,而实验组(Physics 2 2023A)将 ChatGPT 作为学习工具加以整合。我们的结果表明,ChatGPT 的使用导致学生表现显著下降,具体表现为与对照组相比更低的成绩和负的 Hake 因子。此外,一项学生调查揭示了对 ChatGPT 在物理教学中实用性的矛盾看法。虽然大多数人认可其在理解概念和提供信息方面的用处,但也有人担心它可能削弱批判性思维和自主学习。这些发现表明,尽管 ChatGPT 可以是一种有用的工具,但应谨慎使用,并作为传统教学方法的补充,而不是独立解决方案。本研究强调了在教育环境中批判性和反思性地使用人工智能工具的重要性,并突出了教师在提供全面教育支持方面不可替代的作用。

英文摘要:

This study investigates the influence of ChatGPT, an AI-based language model, on student performance in a physics course. We conducted an experimental analysis with two cohorts of students in a second-semester engineering physics course. The control group (Physics 2 2022B) used traditional teaching methods, while the experimental group (Physics 2 2023A) integrated ChatGPT as a learning tool. Our results indicate that the use of ChatGPT led to a significant decrease in student performance, as evidenced by lower grades and negative Hake factors compared to the control group. In addition, a survey of students revealed conflicting perceptions of the usefulness of ChatGPT in teaching physics. While most recognized its usefulness in understanding concepts and providing information, concerns were raised about its potential to reduce critical thinking and independent learning. These findings suggest that while ChatGPT can be a useful tool, it should be used with caution and as a supplement to traditional teaching methods, rather than as a stand-alone solution. The study underlines the importance of critical and reflective use of AI tools in educational settings and highlights the irreplaceable role of teachers in providing comprehensive educational support.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑