arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2311.04034cs.LGcs.AI
收藏

HPO对AutoML预测集成模型的影响

Impact of HPO on AutoML Forecasting Ensembles

Amazon Research(亚马逊研究院)

David Hoffmann

AI总结:

本文研究在含多种估计器的AutoML预测集成模型中,为深度学习模型加入不同超参数优化策略的成本与性能权衡,最终方案准确率优于基线且性能超过商用Amazon Forecast。

摘要:

由多种局部和全局单变量预测估计器(尤其是MQ-CNN、DeepAR、Prophet、NPTS、ARIMA和ETS)组成的预测集成模型,可用于解决各类预测问题。本文深入研究了在此类设置中为深度学习模型(DeepAR和MQ-CNN)添加不同超参数优化策略的问题,探究了不同配置下新增训练成本与准确率提升之间的权衡。研究表明,在此设置中加入超参数优化可带来性能提升:最终配置相较于无HPO的基线集成模型,avg-wQL(平均加权分位数损失)准确率提升9.9%,同时端到端集成延迟增加65.8%。该提升基于对集成流水线与不同调优策略(即贝叶斯优化和Hyperband)及这些策略的不同配置相结合的实证分析。在最终配置中,所提出的集成学习与HPO的组合方案优于最先进的商用AutoML预测解决方案Amazon Forecast,误差降低3.5%,端到端集成延迟降低16.0%。

英文摘要:

A forecasting ensemble consisting of a diverse range of estimators for both local and global univariate forecasting, in particular MQ-CNN,DeepAR, Prophet, NPTS, ARIMA and ETS, can be used to make forecasts for a variety of problems. This paper delves into the aspect of adding different hyperparameter optimization strategies to the deep learning models in such a setup (DeepAR and MQ-CNN), exploring the trade-off between added training cost and the increase in accuracy for different configurations. It shows that in such a setup, adding hyperparameter optimization can lead to performance improvements, with the final setup having a 9.9 % percent accuracy improvement with respect to the avg-wQL over the baseline ensemble without HPO, accompanied by a 65.8 % increase in end-to-end ensemble latency. This improvement is based on an empirical analysis of combining the ensemble pipeline with different tuning strategies, namely Bayesian Optimisation and Hyperband and different configurations of those strategies. In the final configuration, the proposed combination of ensemble learning and HPO outperforms the state of the art commercial AutoML forecasting solution, Amazon Forecast, with a 3.5 % lower error and 16.0 % lower end-to-end ensemble latency.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑