arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2311.03436astro-ph.SRastro-ph.GA
收藏

来自 $Gaia$ DR3 宽距双星的引力定律强约束

Strong constraints on the gravitational law from $Gaia$ DR3 wide binaries

Scottish Universities Physics Alliance, University of Saint Andrews(圣安德鲁斯大学);The School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London(伦敦大学玛丽女王学院);Université de Strasbourg, CNRS UMR 7550, Observatoire astronomique de Strasbourg(斯特拉斯堡大学);European Southern Observatory(欧洲南方天文台)

Indranil Banik, Charalambos Pittordis, Will Sutherland, Benoit Famaey, Rodrigo Ibata, Steffen Mieske, Hongsheng Zhao

AI总结:

利用Gaia DR3的8611个宽距双星数据,通过轨道积分和统计比较,以19σ置信度支持牛顿引力,以16σ排除MOND,表明MOND需在小尺度上修改。

摘要:

我们利用间距为 $2-30$ kAU 的宽距双星(WBs)检验米尔格罗姆动力学(MOND)。在局域,考虑到银河系外场效应(EFE),在渐近大间距下,MOND 中的 WB 轨道速度应超出牛顿预言约 $20\\%$。我们通过对 $Gaia$ DR3 数据中太阳附近 250 pc 内的 8611 个 WBs 进行详细的统计分析来研究这一点。轨道在严格计算的引力场中积分,该场直接包含 EFE。我们还考虑了视线污染和每个 WB 中未被探测到的密近双星伴星。我们使用参数 $\alpha_{\rm{grav}}$ 在牛顿和米尔格罗姆预言之间插值,其中 0 表示牛顿引力,1 表示 MOND。直接比较最佳牛顿和米尔格罗姆模型显示,牛顿动力学在 $19\sigma$ 置信度下更受青睐。使用互补的马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗分析,我们发现 $\alpha_{\rm{grav}} = -0.021^{+0.065}_{-0.045}$,这与牛顿引力完全一致,但在 $16\sigma$ 置信度下排除了 MOND。这与 Pittordis 和 Sutherland 使用略有不同的样本选择和较少探索的族群模型得到的类似结果一致。我们表明,尽管我们最佳拟合模型不能完全重现观测,但在相当大的分析变化范围内,对牛顿引力的压倒性强烈偏好仍然存在。将 MOND 插值函数调整以解释这一结果将导致与旋转曲线约束的紧张关系。我们结合其他工作讨论了我们结果的更广泛意义,得出结论:MOND 必须在小尺度上进行实质性修改才能解释局域 WBs。

英文摘要:

We test Milgromian dynamics (MOND) using wide binary stars (WBs) with separations of $2-30$ kAU. Locally, the WB orbital velocity in MOND should exceed the Newtonian prediction by $\approx 20\%$ at asymptotically large separations given the Galactic external field effect (EFE). We investigate this with a detailed statistical analysis of $Gaia$ DR3 data on 8611 WBs within 250 pc of the Sun. Orbits are integrated in a rigorously calculated gravitational field that directly includes the EFE. We also allow line of sight contamination and undetected close binary companions to the stars in each WB. We interpolate between the Newtonian and Milgromian predictions using the parameter $α_{\rm{grav}}$, with 0 indicating Newtonian gravity and 1 indicating MOND. Directly comparing the best Newtonian and Milgromian models reveals that Newtonian dynamics is preferred at $19σ$ confidence. Using a complementary Markov Chain Monte Carlo analysis, we find that $α_{\rm{grav}} = -0.021^{+0.065}_{-0.045}$, which is fully consistent with Newtonian gravity but excludes MOND at $16σ$ confidence. This is in line with the similar result of Pittordis and Sutherland using a somewhat different sample selection and less thoroughly explored population model. We show that although our best-fitting model does not fully reproduce the observations, an overwhelmingly strong preference for Newtonian gravity remains in a considerable range of variations to our analysis. Adapting the MOND interpolating function to explain this result would cause tension with rotation curve constraints. We discuss the broader implications of our results in light of other works, concluding that MOND must be substantially modified on small scales to account for local WBs.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑