arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2311.03401cs.IRcs.DLcs.LG
收藏

增强AI科研论文分析:基于分解式Transformer序列建模方法的方法论成分提取

Enhancing AI Research Paper Analysis: Methodology Component Extraction using Factored Transformer-based Sequence Modeling Approach

Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science(印度科学培育协会);University of Glasgow(格拉斯哥大学);Jadavpur University(贾达普大学)

Madhusudan Ghosh, Debasis Ganguly, Partha Basuchowdhuri, Sudip Kumar Naskar

AI总结:

针对科研论文中方法论成分名称难自动提取的问题,提出结合领域类别信息的分解式Transformer序列建模方法,在模拟时间顺序的少样本实验中表现优于SOTA基线,最高提升9.257%。

摘要:

各科学学科的研究往往会随着新方法论及其相关术语的出现而快速演进。尽管方法论本身具有概念性,且相当难以自动提取和表征,但本文旨在开发监督模型,用于自动提取方法论的各类组成部分的名称,例如“R-CNN”“ELMo”等。该任务的主要研究挑战在于,在少样本甚至零样本设置下有效建模这些方法论成分名称的上下文。本文针对有效识别不断演进的科学方法论名称的主要贡献如下:i)我们提出了一种序列建模的分解式方法,该方法利用了方法论领域的宽泛类别信息,例如“NLP(自然语言处理)”“RL(强化学习)”等;ii)为了验证我们所提出的在AI文献快速演进的实际场景下识别方法论成分名称的方法的可行性,我们采用模拟时间顺序的设置开展实验(训练过程中未见过更新的方法论);iii)我们的实验表明,在少样本设置下的方法论提取任务中,该分解式方法的表现优于当前最优基线,优势幅度最高达9.257%。

英文摘要:

Research in scientific disciplines evolves, often rapidly, over time with the emergence of novel methodologies and their associated terminologies. While methodologies themselves being conceptual in nature and rather difficult to automatically extract and characterise, in this paper, we seek to develop supervised models for automatic extraction of the names of the various constituents of a methodology, e.g., `R-CNN', `ELMo' etc. The main research challenge for this task is effectively modeling the contexts around these methodology component names in a few-shot or even a zero-shot setting. The main contributions of this paper towards effectively identifying new evolving scientific methodology names are as follows: i) we propose a factored approach to sequence modeling, which leverages a broad-level category information of methodology domains, e.g., `NLP', `RL' etc.; ii) to demonstrate the feasibility of our proposed approach of identifying methodology component names under a practical setting of fast evolving AI literature, we conduct experiments following a simulated chronological setup (newer methodologies not seen during the training process); iii) our experiments demonstrate that the factored approach outperforms state-of-the-art baselines by margins of up to 9.257\% for the methodology extraction task with the few-shot setup.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑