arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2310.16632cs.HC
收藏

评估在线任务中主观信任、置信度测量与鼠标轨迹特征之间的关系

Assessing the relationship between subjective trust, confidence measurements, and mouse trajectory characteristics in an online task

Martin Dechant, Susanne Poeller, Benedikt Hosp, Olga Lukashova-Sanz, Alexandra Sipatchin, Siegfried Wahl

AI总结:

本研究通过146名参与者评估推文冒犯性的在线任务,探讨主观信任、置信度与鼠标轨迹特征的关系,发现轨迹受信任和置信度影响但无法单独解释方差,为AI系统低成本信任评估提供参考。

摘要:

信任对于我们与他人的互动以及与人工智能(AI)系统的互动都至关重要。要了解用户是否信任AI,研究人员需要可靠的测量工具。然而,目前讨论的标记主要依赖于昂贵且侵入性的传感器,如脑电图,这可能会引起不适。鼠标轨迹分析已被建议作为一种评估信任的便捷工具。然而,信任、置信度与鼠标轨迹之间的关系尚未完全明了。为了提供对这一关系的更多见解,我们要求参与者(n = 146)在AI提供其评估的同时,对几条推文是否具有冒犯性进行评分。我们的结果揭示了鼠标轨迹的哪些方面受用户主观信任和置信度评分的影响;但结果表明,这些测量可能无法充分解释方差,因此不能单独使用。本研究探讨了AI系统中潜在的低成本信任评估方法。

英文摘要:

Trust is essential for our interactions with others but also with artificial intelligence (AI) based systems. To understand whether a user trusts an AI, researchers need reliable measurement tools. However, currently discussed markers mostly rely on expensive and invasive sensors, like electroencephalograms, which may cause discomfort. The analysis of mouse trajectory has been suggested as a convenient tool for trust assessment. However, the relationship between trust, confidence and mouse trajectory is not yet fully understood. To provide more insights into this relationship, we asked participants (n = 146) to rate whether several tweets were offensive while an AI suggested its assessment. Our results reveal which aspects of the mouse trajectory are affected by the users subjective trust and confidence ratings; yet they indicate that these measures might not explain sufficiently the variance to be used on their own. This work examines a potential low-cost trust assessment in AI systems.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑