arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2310.14331physics.flu-dyn
收藏

基于多保真度深度学习的湍流模型认知不确定性量化方法

Multi-fidelity Deep Learning-based methodology for epistemic uncertainty quantification of turbulence models

Minghan Chu, Weicheng Qian

AI总结:

针对湍流模型特征空间扰动方法不确定性估计过于保守的问题,提出基于CNN的多保真度深度学习方法,通过学习RANS与DNS差异调制扰动程度,实现更优校准的不确定性量化。

摘要:

使用湍流模型的计算流体力学(CFD)模拟在工程设计中很常用。在现有的不同湍流建模方法中,涡粘性模型因其计算经济性而最为常见。涡粘性模型为了这种经济性利用了许多简化,例如梯度扩散和各向同性涡粘性假设。这些简化限制了涡粘性模型复现湍流物理的程度,并导致模型形式不确定性。特征空间扰动方法(EPM)被开发用于对湍流模型预测中的这种模型形式不确定性进行纯物理估计。由于基于物理的性质,EPM对所有物理上可能的结果赋予同等权重,导致在许多情况下不确定性估计过于保守。在本研究中,我们使用数据驱动的机器学习(ML)方法来解决这一局限性。使用ML模型,我们可以根据物理上可能结果的似然性对其进行加权,从而实现更好的不确定性估计校准。具体而言,我们使用ML模型预测流场域内EPM中的扰动程度。这项工作专注于基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的模型,以学习雷诺平均纳维-斯托克斯(RANS)和直接数值模拟(DNS)预测之间的差异。该模型充当标记函数,调制EPM中的扰动程度。我们表明,这种物理约束的机器学习框架优于纯物理或纯ML的替代方案,并产生保守性更低且校准改善的不确定性边界。

英文摘要:

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations using turbulence models are commonly used in engineering design. Of the different turbulence modeling approaches that are available, eddy viscosity based models are the most common for their computational economy. Eddy viscosity based models utilize many simplifications for this economy such as the gradient diffusion and the isotropic eddy viscosity hypotheses. These simplifications limit the degree to which eddy viscosity models can replicate turbulence physics and lead to model form uncertainty. The Eigenspace Perturbation Method (EPM) has been developed for purely physics based estimates of this model form uncertainty in turbulence model predictions. Due to its physics based nature, the EPM weighs all physically possible outcomes equally leading to overly conservative uncertainty estimates in many cases. In this investigation we use data driven Machine Learning (ML) approaches to address this limitation. Using ML models, we can weigh the physically possible outcomes by their likelihood leading to better calibration of the uncertainty estimates. Specifically, we use ML models to predict the degree of perturbations in the EPM over the flow domain. This work focuses on a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based model to learn the discrepancy between Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) and Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) predictions. This model acts as a marker function, modulating the degree of perturbations in the EPM. We show that this physics constrained machine learning framework performs better than the purely physics or purely ML alternatives, and leads to less conservative uncertainty bounds with improved calibration.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑