arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2310.09545stat.MEecon.EMmath.STstat.MLstat.TH
收藏

一种用于策略学习的半参数工具变量双重差分方法

A Semiparametric Instrumented Difference-in-Differences Approach to Policy Learning

Pan Zhao, Yifan Cui

AI总结:

本文提出一种半参数工具变量双重差分方法,利用二元工具变量在平行趋势假设不成立时识别并学习最优处理策略,构建了Wald、IPW及多重稳健估计量,并扩展到面板数据,通过模拟和真实数据验证了其有效性。

摘要:

近年来,用于评估因果效应的双重差分(DiD)方法在方法论上取得了大量进展。文献中的标准方法依赖于平行趋势假设来识别处理组的平均处理效应。然而,在存在未测量的混杂因素时,平行趋势假设可能被违反,并且处理组的平均处理效应可能不适用于学习针对整个总体的处理分配策略。在本文中,我们提出了一种通用的工具变量双重差分方法,用于学习最优处理策略。具体而言,当平行趋势假设不成立时,我们利用二元工具变量(IV)建立了识别结果。此外,我们构建了Wald估计量、新颖的逆概率加权(IPW)估计量以及一类半参数有效且多重稳健的估计量,这些估计量即使在依赖灵活的机器学习算法进行 nuisance 参数估计时,也具有一致性和渐近正态性的理论保证。进一步地,我们将工具变量双重差分方法扩展到面板数据设置。我们通过广泛的模拟实验和一个真实数据应用来评估我们的方法。

英文摘要:

Recently, there has been a surge in methodological development for the difference-in-differences (DiD) approach to evaluate causal effects. Standard methods in the literature rely on the parallel trends assumption to identify the average treatment effect on the treated. However, the parallel trends assumption may be violated in the presence of unmeasured confounding, and the average treatment effect on the treated may not be useful in learning a treatment assignment policy for the entire population. In this article, we propose a general instrumented DiD approach for learning the optimal treatment policy. Specifically, we establish identification results using a binary instrumental variable (IV) when the parallel trends assumption fails to hold. Additionally, we construct a Wald estimator, novel inverse probability weighting (IPW) estimators, and a class of semiparametric efficient and multiply robust estimators, with theoretical guarantees on consistency and asymptotic normality, even when relying on flexible machine learning algorithms for nuisance parameters estimation. Furthermore, we extend the instrumented DiD to the panel data setting. We evaluate our methods in extensive simulations and a real data application.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑