论地球极轴倾角（气候）：若干“印象派”式评述
On the tilt of the Earth's polar axis (climat): Some 'impressionist' remarks
AI总结：
本文基于百年定义与观测，以印象派式图景讨论气候各物理参数的稳定性，并提出地面温度可能只是气候的结果而非独立参数。
摘要：
在这封长信中，我们希望基于一个多世纪以来确立的定义以及我们同样收集了一个多世纪的直接观测来讨论气候概念。为此，我们呈现并讨论了构成气候整体的各种物理参数在时间上显著稳定的分布图：太阳温度、大气压力、风、降水、温度异常。随着我们思考的展开，我们逐渐勾勒出的这幅印象派图景将我们引向如下命题：如果正如拉普拉斯于1799年首次提出、后来米兰科维奇于1920年再次提出的那样，地面温度仅仅是气候的结果，而并非气候本身的一个独立参数，那会怎样？
英文摘要：
In this lengthy letter, we wanted to discuss the concept of climate based on definitions established for over a century and direct observations that we have been collecting for more than a century as well. To do this, we present and discuss the remarkably stable maps over time of the various physical parameters that make up the climate corpus: solar temperature, atmospheric pressure, winds, precipitation, temperature anomalies. This impressionistic tableau that we are gradually sketching as our reflection unfolds leads us to the following proposition: What if, as Laplace first proposed in 1799 and later Milankovi\{'}c in 1920, ground temperature were merely a consequence of climate and not a separate parameter of climate in its own right?
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
