arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2309.10492cs.CLcs.AI

GPT-4在ETHICS数据集上的评估

An Evaluation of GPT-4 on the ETHICS Dataset

SingularityNet(奇点网);CIIRC(捷克信息学、机器人学和控制论研究所)

Sergey Rodionov, Zarathustra Amadeus Goertzel, Ben Goertzel

AI总结:

本文评估了GPT-4在ETHICS数据集上的表现,发现其显著优于以往模型,表明学习共享人类价值观并非AI伦理的核心难题。

摘要:

本报告总结了对GPT-4在ETHICS数据集上表现的简短研究。ETHICS数据集由五个子数据集组成,涵盖伦理学的不同领域:Justice(正义)、Deontology(义务论)、Virtue Ethics(德性伦理学)、Utilitarianism(功利主义)和Commonsense Ethics(常识伦理学)。这些道德判断经过精心整理,以具有高度一致性为目标,旨在代表共享的人类价值观而非道德困境。GPT-4的表现远优于此前的模型,表明学习与共同人类价值观协作并非AI伦理中的难题。

英文摘要:

This report summarizes a short study of the performance of GPT-4 on the ETHICS dataset. The ETHICS dataset consists of five sub-datasets covering different fields of ethics: Justice, Deontology, Virtue Ethics, Utilitarianism, and Commonsense Ethics. The moral judgments were curated so as to have a high degree of agreement with the aim of representing shared human values rather than moral dilemmas. GPT-4's performance is much better than that of previous models and suggests that learning to work with common human values is not the hard problem for AI ethics.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑