arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2309.09024physics.ao-phphysics.comp-phphysics.data-an

神经网络参数化的可解释离线-在线训练:小数据机制下的1D重力波-QBO试验台

Explainable Offline-Online Training of Neural Networks for Parameterizations: A 1D Gravity Wave-QBO Testbed in the Small-data Regime

Hamid A. Pahlavan, Pedram Hassanzadeh, M. Joan Alexander

AI总结:

本研究利用一维QBO-GW试验台,对比大数据与小数据机制下神经网络离线训练效果,发现仅两层在线再训练即可产生真实QBO,并通过傅里叶分析揭示其机制,为气候参数化提供通用策略。

摘要:

训练神经网络(NN)作为次网格尺度参数化存在不同策略。在此,我们使用准两年振荡(QBO)和重力波(GW)参数化的一维模型作为试验台。一个12层卷积神经网络,用于预测给定风廓线的重力波强迫,当在大数据机制(100年)下离线训练时,一旦与一维模型耦合,便能产生真实的QBO。相反,在小数据机制(18个月)下离线训练该神经网络,则产生不真实的QBO。然而,仅使用集合卡尔曼反演和仅时间平均的QBO统计量,对该神经网络的仅两层进行在线再训练,所得参数化能产生真实的QBO。对这三个神经网络核的傅里叶分析揭示了再训练为何及如何起作用,并表明这些神经网络主要学习低通、高通以及带通滤波器的组合,这与重力波传播/耗散中局部和非局部动力学的重要性一致。这些发现/策略普遍适用于其他气候过程的数据驱动参数化。

英文摘要:

There are different strategies for training neural networks (NNs) as subgrid-scale parameterizations. Here, we use a 1D model of the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) and gravity wave (GW) parameterizations as testbeds. A 12-layer convolutional NN that predicts GW forcings for given wind profiles, when trained offline in a big-data regime (100-years), produces realistic QBOs once coupled to the 1D model. In contrast, offline training of this NN in a small-data regime (18-months) yields unrealistic QBOs. However, online re-training of just two layers of this NN using ensemble Kalman inversion and only time-averaged QBO statistics leads to parameterizations that yield realistic QBOs. Fourier analysis of these three NNs' kernels suggests why/how re-training works and reveals that these NNs primarily learn low-pass, high-pass, and a combination of band-pass filters, consistent with the importance of both local and non-local dynamics in GW propagation/dissipation. These findings/strategies apply to data-driven parameterizations of other climate processes generally.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑