arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2309.08047cs.CL

新闻摘要中的偏见:测量、陷阱与语料库

Bias in News Summarization: Measures, Pitfalls and Corpora

Heidelberg University(海德堡大学)

Julius Steen, Katja Markert

AI总结:

本文针对摘要任务中的社会偏见问题,提出受控人口统计属性的输入文档生成方法,并测量性别与种族偏见,发现内容选择基本不受性别偏见影响,而幻觉存在偏见。

摘要:

摘要是大语言模型(LLMs)的一项重要应用。以往对摘要模型的评估大多关注其内容选择、忠实性、语法性和连贯性。然而,众所周知,LLMs可能会复制并强化有害的社会偏见。这引出了一个问题:在摘要这类受限场景中,偏见是否会影响模型输出?为了帮助回答这一问题,我们首先提出并引入了一系列针对摘要模型中偏见行为的定义,以及相应的可操作化方法。由于我们发现输入文档中固有的偏见会混淆对摘要的偏见分析,因此我们提出了一种生成具有精心控制的人口统计属性的输入文档的方法。这使我们能够在受控环境中研究摘要器的行为,同时仍使用现实的输入文档。作为案例研究,我们测量了由专用摘要模型和通用聊天模型生成的英文摘要中的性别偏见。我们发现,单文档摘要中的内容选择在很大程度上不受性别偏见影响,而幻觉现象则表现出偏见的证据。为了证明我们方法的通用性,我们还研究了种族偏见,包括交叉性场景。

英文摘要:

Summarization is an important application of large language models (LLMs). Most previous evaluation of summarization models has focused on their content selection, faithfulness, grammaticality and coherence. However, it is well known that LLMs can reproduce and reinforce harmful social biases. This raises the question: Do biases affect model outputs in a constrained setting like summarization? To help answer this question, we first motivate and introduce a number of definitions for biased behaviours in summarization models, along with practical operationalizations. Since we find that biases inherent to input documents can confound bias analysis in summaries, we propose a method to generate input documents with carefully controlled demographic attributes. This allows us to study summarizer behavior in a controlled setting, while still working with realistic input documents. We measure gender bias in English summaries generated by both purpose-built summarization models and general purpose chat models as a case study. We find content selection in single document summarization to be largely unaffected by gender bias, while hallucinations exhibit evidence of bias. To demonstrate the generality of our approach, we additionally investigate racial bias, including intersectional settings.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑