人工智能对数字教育演进的影响:针对ChatGPT、Bing Chat、Bard及Ernie等OpenAI文本生成工具的比较研究
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Evolution of Digital Education: A Comparative Study of OpenAI Text Generation Tools including ChatGPT, Bing Chat, Bard, and Ernie
AI总结:
本文对比ChatGPT等多款OpenAI文本生成工具在数字教育中的作用,梳理AI在教育多维度的应用价值,指出其滥用风险,倡导教育界与AI工具协同并制定伦理规范。
摘要:
在数字时代,人工智能(AI)与教育的融合带来了变革性变化,重新定义了教学方法、课程规划与学生参与度。本综述论文通过对比OpenAI旗下具有开创性的文本生成工具(包括Bing Chat、Bard、Ernie,并重点聚焦全新的ChatGPT)的功能与影响,深入探究了快速演变的数字教育格局。本文以从制度、过程、结果三个维度审视教育的类型学为基础,梳理了AI的多方面应用:从推动全球教育去中心化、实现课程个性化,到对基于能力的学习成果进行数字化记录,AI始终站在教育现代化的前沿。研究特别指出,ChatGPT仅用五天就实现了百万用户量的飞速增长,凸显了其在推动教育公平、培养自主学习能力以及提升学生参与度方面的作用。然而,这种变革性力量也存在被滥用的可能,因为文本生成工具可能会在不经意间对学术诚信构成挑战。通过对比AI在教育领域的前景与隐患,本文倡导AI工具与教育界形成协调协同的关系,强调亟需制定伦理准则、开展教学法调整以及推进战略合作。
英文摘要:
In the digital era, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in education has ushered in transformative changes, redefining teaching methodologies, curriculum planning, and student engagement. This review paper delves deep into the rapidly evolving landscape of digital education by contrasting the capabilities and impact of OpenAI's pioneering text generation tools like Bing Chat, Bard, Ernie with a keen focus on the novel ChatGPT. Grounded in a typology that views education through the lenses of system, process, and result, the paper navigates the multifaceted applications of AI. From decentralizing global education and personalizing curriculums to digitally documenting competence-based outcomes, AI stands at the forefront of educational modernization. Highlighting ChatGPT's meteoric rise to one million users in just five days, the study underscores its role in democratizing education, fostering autodidacticism, and magnifying student engagement. However, with such transformative power comes the potential for misuse, as text-generation tools can inadvertently challenge academic integrity. By juxtaposing the promise and pitfalls of AI in education, this paper advocates for a harmonized synergy between AI tools and the educational community, emphasizing the urgent need for ethical guidelines, pedagogical adaptations, and strategic collaborations.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。