arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
稍安勿躁,官方尚未更新
arXiv 2308.08029cs.AIcs.LGq-bio.NC
收藏

Sophisticated Learning:一种用于基于模型规划的主动学习新算法

Sophisticated Learning: A novel algorithm for active learning during model-based planning

Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA(脑研究杰出研究院);University of Cape Town, South Africa(开普敦大学);MIND Institute(MIND研究院);CSAM, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa(CSAM,瓦特斯兰大学);Delft University of Technology, Department of Cognitive Robotics(代尔夫特理工大学认知机器人学系)

Rowan Hodson, Bruce Bassett, Charel van Hoof, Benjamin Rosman, Mark Solms, Jonathan P. Shock, Ryan Smith

AI总结:

本文提出 Sophisticated Learning (SL) 算法,将主动参数学习嵌入 Active Inference 的树搜索框架,通过反事实推理优化模型参数;实验表明,SL 在极端不确定性下显著提升了决策效率和收敛速度,并展现出优于 SI 和 BARL 的存活表现。

摘要:

我们引入了 Sophisticated Learning (SL),这是一种规划学习算法,将主动参数学习嵌入到 Active Inference 的 Sophisticated Inference (SI) 树搜索框架中。与仅优化关于隐藏状态信念的 SI 不同,SL 还在每个模拟分支中更新关于模型参数的信念,从而能够对未来的观察将如何改善后续规划进行反事实推理。我们将 SL 与 Bayes-adaptive Reinforcement Learning (BARL) 智能体及其父算法 SI 进行了比较。使用一个生物学启发的季节性觅食任务(资源在 10x10 网格上概率性地转移),我们设计了迫使智能体在概率性奖励收集与信息收集之间取得平衡的实验。在需要快速学习的早期试验中,SL 智能体的存活时间平均比 SI 长 8.2%,比 Bayes-adaptive Reinforcement Learning 长 35%。虽然 SL 和 SI 表现出相同的收敛性能,但 SL 达到这种收敛的速度比 SI 快 40%。此外,在改变的环境配置中,SL 表现出对其他算法的稳健优势。我们的结果表明,将主动学习纳入多步规划实质性地改善了极端不确定性下的决策,并进一步证实了 Active Inference 在建模生物学相关行为方面的广泛效用。

英文摘要:

We introduce Sophisticated Learning (SL), a planning-to-learn algorithm that embeds active parameter learning inside the Sophisticated Inference (SI) tree-search framework of Active Inference. Unlike SI -- which optimizes beliefs about hidden states -- SL also updates beliefs about model parameters within each simulated branch, enabling counterfactual reasoning about how future observations would improve subsequent planning. We compared SL with Bayes-adaptive Reinforcement Learning (BARL) agents as well as with its parent algorithm, SI. Using a biologically inspired seasonal foraging task in which resources shift probabilistically over a 10x10 grid, we designed experiments that forced agents to balance probabilistic reward harvesting against information gathering. In early trials, where rapid learning is vital, SL agents survive, on average, 8.2% longer than SI and 35% longer than Bayes-adaptive Reinforcement Learning. While both SL and SI showed equal convergence performance, SL reached this convergence 40% faster than SI. Additionally, SL showed robust out-performance of other algorithms in altered environment configurations. Our results show that incorporating active learning into multi-step planning materially improves decision making under radical uncertainty, and reinforces the broader utility of Active Inference for modeling biologically relevant behavior.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑