arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2308.03341physics.hist-phquant-ph
收藏

Bertlmann的袜子:来自维也纳的视角

Bertlmann's socks from a Viennese perspective

Marcello Poletti

AI总结:

本文从维也纳视角探讨量子力学悖论,提出通过辨明逻辑与量子不可判定性及观察者关系,可调和量子特异行为与规范性。

摘要:

量子力学是一种既有效又反直觉的理论。虽然量子实践运作无瑕,但它们迫使我们接受诸如态矢量坍缩和非定域性等神秘现象,从而将我们推向站不住脚的“我不作假说”立场。然而,在其诞生一个世纪之后,我们迎来了一个有希望的诠释性关键,这一关键早在1974年就由惠勒暗示过。如果我们能够辨明逻辑不可判定性与量子不可判定性之间的关系,这一理论的诠释悖论或许就能得到解决。本文将展示这两者如何与观察者/被观察者之间的关系问题紧密相连,以及沿着这条路径,量子物理的特异行为如何能与规范性相协调。

英文摘要:

Quantum mechanics is a theory that is as effective as it is counterintuitive. While quantum practices operate impeccably, they compel us to embrace enigmatic phenomena like the collapse of the state vector and non-locality, thereby pushing us towards untenable "hypotheses non fingo" stances. However, a century after its inception, we are presented with a promising interpretive key, intimated by Wheeler as early as 1974. The interpretative paradoxes of this theory might be resolved if we discern the relationship between logical undecidability and quantum undecidability. It will be demonstrated how both are intricately linked to an observer/observed relational issue, and how the idiosyncratic behaviours of quantum physics can be reconciled with the normative, following this path.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑