LLMs拥有性格吗？让MBTI测试成为大型语言模型的出色评估方法
Do LLMs Possess a Personality? Making the MBTI Test an Amazing Evaluation for Large Language Models
AI总结：
本文探讨了将MBTI作为大型语言模型评估指标的可行性，通过大量实验分析了不同LLMs的性格类型、提示工程对性格的改变以及训练数据集的影响，表明MBTI可作为反映模型与人类性格相似度的粗略指示器。
摘要：
大型语言模型（LLMs）领域取得了显著进展，其知识存储容量正接近人类水平。此外，诸如提示学习和强化学习等先进技术正被用于解决与LLMs相关的伦理问题和幻觉问题，使其更接近于符合人类价值观。这种情况自然引发了一个问题：具备类人能力的LLMs是否也具备类人的性格？在本文中，我们旨在探讨将迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标（MBTI）——一种广泛使用的人类性格评估工具——作为LLMs评估指标的可行性。具体而言，我们将进行大量实验以探究：1）不同LLMs的性格类型，2）通过提示工程改变性格类型的可能性，以及3）训练数据集如何影响模型的性格。尽管MBTI并非一种严谨的评估工具，但它仍能反映出LLMs与人类性格之间的相似性。在实践中，MBTI有潜力作为一种粗略的指示器。我们的代码可在 https://github.com/HarderThenHarder/transformers_tasks/tree/main/LLM/llms_mbti 获取。
英文摘要：
The field of large language models (LLMs) has made significant progress, and their knowledge storage capacity is approaching that of human beings. Furthermore, advanced techniques, such as prompt learning and reinforcement learning, are being employed to address ethical concerns and hallucination problems associated with LLMs, bringing them closer to aligning with human values. This situation naturally raises the question of whether LLMs with human-like abilities possess a human-like personality? In this paper, we aim to investigate the feasibility of using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), a widespread human personality assessment tool, as an evaluation metric for LLMs. Specifically, extensive experiments will be conducted to explore: 1) the personality types of different LLMs, 2) the possibility of changing the personality types by prompt engineering, and 3) How does the training dataset affect the model's personality. Although the MBTI is not a rigorous assessment, it can still reflect the similarity between LLMs and human personality. In practice, the MBTI has the potential to serve as a rough indicator. Our codes are available at https://github.com/HarderThenHarder/transformers_tasks/tree/main/LLM/llms_mbti.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
