arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2307.02469cs.CVcs.CL

在训练具有多模态输入的GPT4-Style语言模型时,什么最重要?

What Matters in Training a GPT4-Style Language Model with Multimodal Inputs?

ByteDance Research(字节跳动研究)

Yan Zeng, Hanbo Zhang, Jiani Zheng, Jiangnan Xia, Guoqiang Wei, Yang Wei, Yuchen Zhang, Tao Kong

AI总结:

本文系统研究了训练GPT4-Style多模态语言模型的关键设计选择,通过实现20多个变体对比网络结构、数据、采样与提示策略,并构建首个图文视频综合评估集,最终提出兼具最佳理解与生成能力的模型Lynx。

摘要:

近期,诸如GPT4等大型语言模型(LLM)在遵循基于图像的开放式指令方面展现出了卓越的多模态能力。然而,这些模型的性能严重依赖于网络结构、训练数据和训练策略等设计选择,而文献中对这些选择的讨论尚不充分,使得难以量化该领域的进展。为解决这一问题,本文对训练此类模型进行了定量和定性的系统全面研究。我们在受控设置下实现了20多个变体。具体而言,在网络结构方面,我们比较了不同的LLM主干和模型设计。在训练数据方面,我们研究了数据和采样策略的影响。在指令方面,我们探讨了多样化提示对训练后模型指令遵循能力的影响。在基准测试方面,据我们所知,我们通过众包构建了首个包含图像和视频任务的全面评估集。基于我们的发现,我们提出了Lynx,与现有的开源GPT4-Style模型相比,它在保持最佳多模态生成能力的同时,实现了最准确的多模态理解。

英文摘要:

Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT4 have displayed exceptional multi-modal capabilities in following open-ended instructions given images. However, the performance of these models heavily relies on design choices such as network structures, training data, and training strategies, and these choices have not been extensively discussed in the literature, making it difficult to quantify progress in this field. To address this issue, this paper presents a systematic and comprehensive study, quantitatively and qualitatively, on training such models. We implement over 20 variants with controlled settings. Concretely, for network structures, we compare different LLM backbones and model designs. For training data, we investigate the impact of data and sampling strategies. For instructions, we explore the influence of diversified prompts on the instruction-following ability of the trained models. For benchmarks, we contribute the first, to our best knowledge, comprehensive evaluation set including both image and video tasks through crowd-sourcing. Based on our findings, we present Lynx, which performs the most accurate multi-modal understanding while keeping the best multi-modal generation ability compared to existing open-sourced GPT4-style models.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑